Suppr超能文献

年龄、听力损失与擦音分类中声学线索的运用

Age and hearing loss and the use of acoustic cues in fricative categorization.

作者信息

Scharenborg Odette, Weber Andrea, Janse Esther

机构信息

Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, 6525 HT, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Wundtlaan 1, 6525 XD, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Sep;138(3):1408-17. doi: 10.1121/1.4927728.

Abstract

This study examined the use of fricative noise information and coarticulatory cues for categorization of word-final fricatives [s] and [f] by younger and older Dutch listeners alike. Particularly, the effect of information loss in the higher frequencies on the use of these two cues for fricative categorization was investigated. If information in the higher frequencies is less strongly available, fricative identification may be impaired or listeners may learn to focus more on coarticulatory information. The present study investigates this second possibility. Phonetic categorization results showed that both younger and older Dutch listeners use the primary cue fricative noise and the secondary cue coarticulatory information to distinguish word-final [f] from [s]. Individual hearing sensitivity in the older listeners modified the use of fricative noise information, but did not modify the use of coarticulatory information. When high-frequency information was filtered out from the speech signal, fricative noise could no longer be used by the younger and older adults. Crucially, they also did not learn to rely more on coarticulatory information as a compensatory cue for fricative categorization. This suggests that listeners do not readily show compensatory use of this secondary cue to fricative identity when fricative categorization becomes difficult.

摘要

本研究考察了荷兰年轻和年长听众利用擦音噪声信息和协同发音线索对词尾擦音[s]和[f]进行分类的情况。具体而言,研究了高频信息损失对利用这两种线索进行擦音分类的影响。如果高频信息不太容易获取,擦音识别可能会受到损害,或者听众可能会学会更多地关注协同发音信息。本研究探讨的是后一种可能性。语音分类结果表明,荷兰年轻和年长听众都利用主要线索擦音噪声和次要线索协同发音信息来区分词尾的[f]和[s]。年长听众的个体听力敏感度改变了擦音噪声信息的使用,但没有改变协同发音信息的使用。当从语音信号中滤除高频信息时,年轻和年长成年人都无法再利用擦音噪声。关键的是,他们也没有学会更多地依赖协同发音信息作为擦音分类的补偿线索。这表明,当擦音分类变得困难时,听众不会轻易地将这种次要线索作为擦音识别的补偿性用途。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验