• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同牙槽骨高度下钛合金桩和碳纤维桩根管治疗后牙齿的应力分布:三维有限元分析

Stress distribution of endodontically treated teeth with titanium alloy post and carbon fiber post with different alveolar bone height: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.

作者信息

Singh S Vijay, Bhat Manohar, Gupta Saurabh, Sharma Deepak, Satija Harsha, Sharma Sumeet

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, D.A.V (c) Dental College and Hospital, Yamunanagar, Haryana, India.

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Jaipur Dental College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

Eur J Dent. 2015 Jul-Sep;9(3):428-432. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.163228.

DOI:10.4103/1305-7456.163228
PMID:26430375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4569998/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis (FEA) on the stress distribution of endodontically treated teeth with titanium alloy post and carbon fiber post with different alveolar bone height.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The 3D model was fabricated using software to represent an endodontically treated mandibular second premolar with post and restored with a full ceramic crown restoration, which was then analyzed using FEA using FEA ANSYS Workbench V13.0 (ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, U.S.A) software.

RESULTS

The FEA showed the maximum stresses of 137.43 Mpa in dentin with alveolar bone height of 4 mm when the titanium post was used, 138.48 Mpa when carbon fiber post was used as compared to 105.91 Mpa in the model with alveolar bone height of 2 mm from the cement enamel junction (CEJ) when the titanium post was used and 107.37 Mpa when the carbon fiber post was used.

CONCLUSIONS

Stress was observed more in alveolar bone height level of 4 mm from CEJ than 2 mm from CEJ. Stresses in the dentin were almost similar when the carbon fiber post was compared to titanium post. However, stresses in the post and the cement were much higher when titanium post was used as compared to carbon fiber post.

摘要

目的

对不同牙槽骨高度下使用钛合金桩和碳纤维桩进行根管治疗的牙齿应力分布进行三维(3D)有限元分析(FEA)。

材料与方法

使用软件制作3D模型,以代表一颗进行了根管治疗的下颌第二前磨牙,带有桩并进行全瓷冠修复,然后使用FEA ANSYS Workbench V13.0(美国宾夕法尼亚州卡农斯堡ANSYS公司)软件进行有限元分析。

结果

有限元分析显示,当使用钛桩时,牙槽骨高度为4mm的牙本质中的最大应力为137.43MPa,使用碳纤维桩时为138.48MPa;相比之下,当使用钛桩时,距牙骨质釉质界(CEJ)牙槽骨高度为2mm的模型中最大应力为105.91MPa,使用碳纤维桩时为107.37MPa。

结论

观察到距CEJ 4mm牙槽骨高度水平的应力比距CEJ 2mm时更大。与钛桩相比,使用碳纤维桩时牙本质中的应力几乎相似。然而,与碳纤维桩相比,使用钛桩时桩和粘结剂中的应力要高得多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3260/4569998/03df421cff1b/EJD-9-428-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3260/4569998/fffe4dbf16a2/EJD-9-428-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3260/4569998/03df421cff1b/EJD-9-428-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3260/4569998/fffe4dbf16a2/EJD-9-428-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3260/4569998/03df421cff1b/EJD-9-428-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Stress distribution of endodontically treated teeth with titanium alloy post and carbon fiber post with different alveolar bone height: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.不同牙槽骨高度下钛合金桩和碳纤维桩根管治疗后牙齿的应力分布:三维有限元分析
Eur J Dent. 2015 Jul-Sep;9(3):428-432. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.163228.
2
Stress distribution of posts on the endodontically treated teeth with and without bone height augmentation: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.有无骨高度增加的根管治疗后牙齿桩的应力分布:三维有限元分析
J Conserv Dent. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):196-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.157242.
3
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of weakened roots restored with different cements in combination with titanium alloy posts.不同粘结剂与钛合金桩联合修复薄弱根管的三维有限元分析
Chin Med J (Engl). 2006 Feb 20;119(4):305-11.
4
Comparison of Stress Distribution in a Maxillary Central Incisor Restored with Two Prefabricated Post Systems with and without Ferrule Using Finite Element Method.使用有限元法比较在上颌中切牙中使用两种带或不带箍的预制桩系统修复时的应力分布
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Sep;10(9):ZC52-ZC55. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19443.8492. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
5
Comparison of stress distribution in teeth restored with fiber post and dentin post by applying orthotropic properties: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.应用正交各向异性特性比较纤维桩和牙本质桩修复牙齿的应力分布:三维有限元分析
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Nov-Dec;23(6):589-592. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_551_20. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
6
Finite element analysis of endodontically treated premolars without ferrule restored with one-piece glass fiber post and core in combination with different inner shoulder retention form systems.根管治疗后无金属翼(ferrule)核桩修复的前磨牙的有限元分析,采用一体式玻璃纤维桩和核,并结合不同的内肩固位形式系统。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023 Jul;143:105912. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105912. Epub 2023 May 20.
7
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution in the endodontically treated maxillary central incisor by glass fiber post and dentin post.玻璃纤维桩与牙本质桩修复上颌中切牙根管治疗后应力分布的三维有限元分析
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):70-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.167933.
8
Stress distribution in endodontically treated abfracted mandibular premolar restored with different cements and crowns: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.用不同粘结剂和全冠修复的根管治疗后下颌楔状缺损前磨牙的应力分布:三维有限元分析
J Conserv Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;21(5):557-561. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_206_18.
9
FEA Comparison of the Mechanical Behavior of Three Dental Crown Materials: Enamel, Ceramic, and Zirconia.三种牙冠材料(牙釉质、陶瓷和氧化锆)力学行为的有限元分析比较
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jan 30;17(3):673. doi: 10.3390/ma17030673.
10
The effect of ferrule height on stress distribution within a tooth restored with fibre posts and ceramic crown: a finite element analysis.桩核高度对纤维桩和陶瓷冠修复牙齿内部应力分布的影响:有限元分析
Dent Mater. 2014 Dec;30(12):1304-15. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Internal and Marginal Shrinkage Stress in Adhesive Class III Cavities Restored with Different Resin Composite Combinations-A 3D-FEA Study.不同树脂复合材料组合修复Ⅲ类洞时内部及边缘收缩应力的评估——一项三维有限元分析研究
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Aug 14;13(8):367. doi: 10.3390/dj13080367.
2
Stress distribution of esthetic posts in the restored maxillary central incisor: Three-dimensional finite-element analysis.上颌中切牙修复中美学桩的应力分布:三维有限元分析
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021 Feb 23;18:10. eCollection 2021.
3
A Comparative Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study of Two Space Regainers in the Mixed Dentition Stage.

本文引用的文献

1
A finite element analysis for a comparative evaluation of stress with two commonly used esthetic posts.两种常用美学桩应力比较评估的有限元分析
Eur J Dent. 2013 Oct;7(4):419-422. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.120668.
2
Effect of occlusal restoration on stresses around class V restoration interface: a finite-element study.Ⅴ类洞修复体界面周围应力的咬合重建效果:一项有限元研究
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Mar-Apr;22(2):295-302. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.84308.
3
Three-year follow up of customized glass fiber esthetic posts.定制玻璃纤维美学桩的三年随访
混合牙列期两种间隙保持器的三维有限元对比研究
Eur J Dent. 2020 Feb;14(1):107-114. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1702254. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
4
Multi-Fiber-Reinforced Composites for the Coronoradicular Reconstruction of Premolar Teeth: A Finite Element Analysis.多纤维增强复合材料用于前磨牙的根管-牙本质复合体重建的有限元分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jun 7;2018:4302607. doi: 10.1155/2018/4302607. eCollection 2018.
5
Effect of Anatomical Customization of the Fiber Post on the Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement.纤维桩解剖学定制对自粘接树脂水门汀粘结强度的影响
Int J Dent. 2017;2017:5010712. doi: 10.1155/2017/5010712. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
6
Post and core build-ups in crown and bridge abutments: Bio-mechanical advantages and disadvantages.冠桥基牙的桩核修复:生物力学优势与劣势
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Jun;9(3):232-237. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.232. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
Eur J Dent. 2011 Jan;5(1):107-12.
4
Influence of post material and length on endodontically treated incisors: an in vitro and finite element study.后牙材料和长度对根管治疗后切牙的影响:一项体外和有限元研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Dec;104(6):379-88. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60171-0.
5
Fracture resistance of teeth restored with post-retained restorations: an overview.桩核修复后牙体的抗折性能:综述。
J Endod. 2010 Sep;36(9):1439-49. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.005.
6
Finite element analysis of stress concentration in Class V restorations of four groups of restorative materials in mandibular premolar.下颌前磨牙四类修复材料Ⅴ类洞修复应力集中的有限元分析
J Conserv Dent. 2008 Jul;11(3):121-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.45251.
7
Classification and prognosis evaluation of individual teeth--a comprehensive approach.单颗牙齿的分类与预后评估——一种综合方法。
Quintessence Int. 2009 May;40(5):377-87.
8
Stress distribution in a post-restored tooth using the three-dimensional finite element method.使用三维有限元方法分析修复后牙齿的应力分布。
J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Sep;33(9):690-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01538.x.
9
Survival time of cast post and cores: a 10-year retrospective study.铸造桩核的存留时间:一项10年的回顾性研究。
J Dent. 2007 Jan;35(1):50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.04.004. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
10
The effect of alveolar bone loss on the load capability of restored endodontically treated teeth: a comparative in vitro study.牙槽骨丧失对根管治疗后修复牙齿负载能力的影响:一项体外对比研究。
J Dent. 2006 Nov;34(10):790-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 Apr 5.