Lee Taeyul, Chung Chulhoon, Chang Yongjoon, Kim Jaehyun
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Arch Plast Surg. 2015 Sep;42(5):608-13. doi: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.5.608. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative morbidities and functional outcomes of pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) flap and cutaneous free flap reconstruction approaches in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients.
We retrospectively reviewed records from 99 patients who underwent hypopharyngeal reconstruction with a cutaneous free flap (n=85) or PMMC flap (n=14) between 1995 and 2013. Morbidity was classified into hospitalization, medical, or flap-related complications. Functional outcomes were classified into oral re-alimentation and decannulation time.
The overall flap-related complication rate was higher in the PMMC flap group (n=8, 57.1%; P=0.019), but the medical morbidity rate was higher in the cutaneous free flap group (n=68, 80%; P=0.006). The rate of pneumonia was higher in the cutaneous free flap group (n=48, 56.5%; P=0.020). Pulmonary premorbidity was the variable most significantly associated with pneumonia (odds ratio=3.012, P=0.012). There was no statistically significant difference in oral re-alimentation and decannulation time between the two groups.
Although the functional superiority of free flaps has been reported in many studies, our results do not support this hypothesis. One limitation of our study is the relatively smaller flap size and fewer PMMC flap cases compared with the cutaneous free flap group. The low postoperative medical morbidity incidence rate in the PMMC flap group was clinically significant; however, the free flap group had more flap-related complications. Thus, PMMC flaps should be considered a viable option, especially for patients with pulmonary premorbidities.
本研究旨在比较下咽鳞状细胞癌患者胸大肌肌皮瓣(PMMC)和游离皮瓣重建方法的术后发病率及功能结局。
我们回顾性分析了1995年至2013年间99例行下咽重建术患者的记录,其中采用游离皮瓣(n = 85)或胸大肌肌皮瓣(n = 14)。发病率分为住院、医疗或皮瓣相关并发症。功能结局分为经口再进食和拔管时间。
胸大肌肌皮瓣组的总体皮瓣相关并发症发生率更高(n = 8,57.1%;P = 0.019),但游离皮瓣组的医疗发病率更高(n = 68,80%;P = 0.006)。游离皮瓣组的肺炎发生率更高(n = 48,56.5%;P = 0.020)。肺部疾病前驱状态是与肺炎最显著相关的变量(比值比 = 3.012,P = 0.012)。两组之间经口再进食和拔管时间无统计学显著差异。
尽管许多研究报道了游离皮瓣的功能优势,但我们的结果不支持这一假设。本研究的一个局限性是与游离皮瓣组相比,皮瓣尺寸相对较小且胸大肌肌皮瓣病例较少。胸大肌肌皮瓣组术后低医疗发病率具有临床意义;然而,游离皮瓣组有更多皮瓣相关并发症。因此,胸大肌肌皮瓣应被视为一种可行的选择,特别是对于有肺部疾病前驱状态的患者。