Two-tiered subdivision of atypia on urine cytology can improve patient follow-up and optimize the utility of UroVysion.

BACKGROUND

The annual incidence of urothelial carcinoma continues to increase, and it is projected that greater than 70,000 new cases will occur in the year 2015. However, as much as 23% of cytologic specimens will demonstrate some degree of atypia without meeting the criteria for urothelial carcinoma and thus will be reported as atypical.

METHODS

The authors conducted 2 laboratory information searches and 1 survey. In total, 311 patients who had atypical cytology-biopsy pairs available were identified from the initial data search. The second data search identified 942 patients who had fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results available.

RESULTS

There was fair agreement between FISH results and cytology results (κ = 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.41). The analysis did not reveal any benefits of using additional atypical subcategories beyond the 2 suggested in the literature. It was determined that 2 strategies would provide an optimal balance: standardizing patient management and facilitating the adoption of universally recognized templates.

CONCLUSIONS

When combining cytology and the 2-tiered atypical classification system with FISH testing, a marked increase in sensitivity and an accompanying decrease in specificity were observed compared with either test individually. Thus, highly sensitive FISH testing may help to identify high-risk patients among those in the group with uncertain atypical findings.