Robey-Gavin Erin, Abuakar Lamies
Department of Pharmacy, Mercy Hospital and Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;50(2):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.07.029.
Pain and anxiety are common in mechanically ventilated patients, and frequently undertreated in the emergency department (ED) setting.
We sought to compare the rate of initiation of postintubation analgesia in the ED before and after intervention by pharmacists specialized in emergency medicine.
This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in the ED. The primary endpoint was overall frequency of analgesia initiation, with subset analysis of RSI during the ED pharmacist (EDP) duty hours. Secondary endpoints included frequency of sedative or anxiolytic use without analgesia, time to initiation of postintubation analgesia, and adverse drug events (ADEs) resulting in analgesia discontinuation.
Forty-one patients were included in each group. The overall rate of postintubation analgesia increased after pharmacist intervention, from 20% to 49% (p = 0.005). Analgesia initiation during EDP hours was 50% and 85% in the pre- and postintervention groups, respectively. In the preintervention group, more patients received sedation without analgesia (73% vs. 51%; p = 0.04), and a small percentage (7%) received neither sedation nor analgesia. Time to initiation of postintubation analgesia decreased from 98 min to 45 min. ADEs were rare: there were no discontinuations of analgesic therapy in the preintervention group and one temporary discontinuation because of hypotension in the postintervention group.
Analgesic use after RSI in the ED significantly increased after the implementation of ED pharmacy services. The large proportion of patients receiving analgesia during the EDP duty hours suggest the increase may be related to direct pharmacist involvement in postintubation management.
疼痛和焦虑在机械通气患者中很常见,在急诊科往往治疗不足。
我们试图比较急诊医学专科药师干预前后急诊科气管插管后镇痛的起始率。
这是一项对在急诊科接受快速顺序插管(RSI)患者的回顾性队列研究。主要终点是镇痛起始的总体频率,并对急诊药师(EDP)值班时间内的RSI进行亚组分析。次要终点包括未使用镇痛的镇静或抗焦虑药物使用频率、气管插管后镇痛开始时间以及导致镇痛中断的不良药物事件(ADEs)。
每组纳入41例患者。药师干预后气管插管后镇痛的总体发生率从20%提高到49%(p = 0.005)。干预前和干预后组在EDP值班时间内的镇痛起始率分别为50%和85%。在干预前组,更多患者接受了无镇痛的镇静(73%对51%;p = 0.04),且一小部分(7%)患者既未接受镇静也未接受镇痛。气管插管后镇痛开始时间从98分钟降至45分钟。ADEs很少见:干预前组无镇痛治疗中断,干预后组有1例因低血压导致暂时中断。
实施急诊药学服务后,急诊科RSI后的镇痛药物使用显著增加。在EDP值班时间内接受镇痛的患者比例很大,这表明增加可能与药师直接参与气管插管后管理有关。