Osvalder Anna-Lisa, Hansson Ida, Bohman Katarina
a Chalmers University of Technology , Gothenburg , Sweden.
b Autoliv Research , Vårgårda , Sweden.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S46-51. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1060416.
The objective of this study was to explore passengers' comfort experience of extra seat belts during on-road driving in the rear seat of a passenger car and to investigate how the use of extra belts affects children's and adults' attitudes to the product.
Two different seat belt systems were tested, criss-cross (CC) and backpack (BP), consisting of the standard 3-point belt together with an additional 2-point belt. In total, 32 participants (15 children aged 6-10, 6 youths aged 11-15, and 11 adults aged 20-79, who differed considerably in size, shape, and proportions) traveled for one hour with each system, including city traffic and highway driving. Four video cameras monitored the test subject during the drive. Subjective data regarding emotions and perceived discomfort were collected in questionnaires every 20 min. A semistructured interview was held afterwards.
All participant groups accepted the new products and especially the increased feeling of safety (P <.01); 56% preferred CC and 44% preferred BP but the difference was not significant. In total, 81% wanted to have extra seat belts in their family car. CC was appreciated for its symmetry, comfort, and the perceived feeling of safety. Some participants found CC unpleasant because the belts tended to slip close to the neck, described as a strangling feeling. BP was simpler to use and did not cause annoyance to the neck in the way CC did. Instead, it felt asymmetric and to some extent less safe than CC. Body size and shape affected seat belt fit to a great extent, which in turn affected the experience of comfort, both initially and over time. Perceived safety benefit and experienced comfort were the most determinant factors for the attitude toward the extra seat belts. The extra seat belts were perceived as being better than the participants had expected before the test, and they became more used to them over time.
This exploratory study provided valuable knowledge from a user perspective for further development of new seat belt systems in cars. In addition to an increased feeling of safety, seat belt fit and comfort are supplementary influencing factors when it comes to gaining acceptance of new seat belt systems.
本研究的目的是探讨乘用车后排乘客在道路行驶过程中使用额外安全带的舒适体验,并调查额外安全带的使用如何影响儿童和成人对该产品的态度。
测试了两种不同的安全带系统,即交叉式(CC)和背包式(BP),它们由标准的三点式安全带和一条额外的两点式安全带组成。共有32名参与者(15名6至10岁的儿童、6名11至15岁的青少年和11名20至79岁的成年人,他们在体型、形状和比例上有很大差异)使用每种系统进行了一小时的行程,包括城市交通和高速公路驾驶。驾驶过程中,四个摄像头对测试对象进行监测。每隔20分钟通过问卷收集关于情绪和感知不适的主观数据。之后进行了半结构化访谈。
所有参与组都接受了新产品,尤其是安全感的增强(P <.01);56%的人更喜欢CC,44%的人更喜欢BP,但差异不显著。总体而言,81%的人希望在他们的家用汽车上配备额外的安全带。CC因其对称性、舒适性和感知到的安全感而受到赞赏。一些参与者觉得CC不舒服,因为安全带在靠近颈部的位置容易滑落,有一种勒脖子的感觉。BP使用起来更简单,不会像CC那样给颈部带来困扰。相反,它感觉不对称,在某种程度上比CC安全性低。体型和形状在很大程度上影响安全带的贴合度,进而影响最初和长期的舒适体验。感知到的安全益处和体验到的舒适度是对额外安全带态度的最决定性因素。额外安全带被认为比参与者在测试前预期的要好,并且随着时间的推移他们对其越来越习惯。
这项探索性研究从用户角度为汽车新安全带系统的进一步开发提供了有价值的知识。除了增强安全感外,安全带的贴合度和舒适度是获得新安全带系统认可的补充影响因素。