• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农村和城市水源流域地表水中的粪便污染

Fecal Contamination in the Surface Waters of a Rural- and an Urban-Source Watershed.

作者信息

Stea Emma C, Truelstrup Hansen Lisbeth, Jamieson Rob C, Yost Christopher K

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2015 Sep;44(5):1556-67. doi: 10.2134/jeq2014.11.0459.

DOI:10.2134/jeq2014.11.0459
PMID:26436273
Abstract

Surface waters are commonly used as source water for drinking water and irrigation. Knowledge of sources of fecal pollution in source watersheds benefits the design of effective source water protection plans. This study analyzed the relationships between enteric pathogens ( O157:H7, spp., and spp. [, and ]), water quality (turbidity, temperature, and ), and human and ruminant-cow and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)-based fecal source tracking (FST) markers in two source watersheds. Water samples ( = 329) were collected at 10 sites (five in each watershed) over 18 mo. The human marker (HF183) occurred in 9 to 10% of the water samples at nine sampling sites; while a forested site in the urban watershed tested negative. Ruminant-cow markers (BacR and CowM2) only appeared in the rural watershed (6%). The mtDNA markers (HcytB and AcytB) showed the same pattern but were less sensitive due to lower fecal concentrations. Higher prevalences ( < 0.05) of spp. (41 vs. 16% for the rural and urban watershed, respectively) and O157:H7 (12 vs. 3%) were observed in the rural watershed, while spp. levels were comparable (23-28%). Densities of ≥100 colony-forming units (CFU) 100 mL increased the odds ( < 0.05) of detecting the enteric bacterial pathogens. The water turbidity levels (nephelometric turbidity units [NTU] ≥ 1.0) similarly predicted ( < 0.05) pathogen presence. Storm events increased ( < 0.01) pathogen and fecal marker concentrations in the waterways. The employment of multiple FST methods suggested failing onsite wastewater systems contribute to human fecal pollution in both watersheds.

摘要

地表水通常用作饮用水和灌溉用水的水源。了解水源流域粪便污染的来源有助于设计有效的水源保护计划。本研究分析了两个水源流域中肠道病原体(O157:H7、[某种菌属]和[某种菌属][以及][某种菌属])、水质(浊度、温度和[某项水质指标])与基于人类和反刍动物(牛)以及线粒体DNA(mtDNA)的粪便来源追踪(FST)标记之间的关系。在18个月内,于10个地点(每个流域5个)采集了329份水样。人类标记物(HF183)在9个采样点的9%至10%的水样中出现;而城市流域的一个森林覆盖地点检测为阴性。反刍动物(牛)标记物(BacR和CowM2)仅出现在农村流域(6%)。mtDNA标记物(HcytB和AcytB)呈现相同模式,但由于粪便浓度较低而敏感性较差。农村流域中[某种菌属](分别为41%和16%,农村和城市流域)和O157:H7(分别为12%和3%)的检出率较高(P<0.05),而[某种菌属]水平相当(23%-28%)。每100毫升中≥100菌落形成单位(CFU)的密度增加了检测到肠道细菌病原体的几率(P<0.05)。水的浊度水平(浊度单位[NTU]≥1.0)同样可预测(P<0.05)病原体的存在。暴雨事件增加了(P<0.01)水道中病原体和粪便标记物的浓度。采用多种FST方法表明,现场污水处理系统故障导致了两个流域的人类粪便污染。

相似文献

1
Fecal Contamination in the Surface Waters of a Rural- and an Urban-Source Watershed.农村和城市水源流域地表水中的粪便污染
J Environ Qual. 2015 Sep;44(5):1556-67. doi: 10.2134/jeq2014.11.0459.
2
Baseline and storm event monitoring of Bacteroidales marker concentrations and enteric pathogen presence in a rural Canadian watershed.在加拿大农村流域中对拟杆菌门标记浓度和肠道病原体存在进行基线和风暴事件监测。
Water Res. 2014 Sep 1;60:278-288. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.04.039. Epub 2014 May 1.
3
An environmental survey of surface waters using mitochondrial DNA from human, bovine and porcine origin as fecal source tracking markers.利用人源、牛源和猪源线粒体 DNA 作为粪便来源追踪标记物对地表水进行环境调查。
Water Res. 2015 Feb 1;69:143-153. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.10.063. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
4
Comparison of Microbial and Chemical Source Tracking Markers To Identify Fecal Contamination Sources in the Humber River (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and Associated Storm Water Outfalls.微生物和化学源追踪标志物用于识别加拿大安大略省多伦多亨伯河及其相关雨水排放口粪便污染源的比较
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Oct 14;82(21):6357-6366. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01675-16. Print 2016 Nov 1.
5
Quantification of Microbial Source Tracking and Pathogenic Bacterial Markers in Water and Sediments of Tiaoxi River (Taihu Watershed).苕溪(太湖流域)水体和沉积物中微生物源追踪及致病细菌标志物的定量分析
Front Microbiol. 2019 Apr 24;10:699. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00699. eCollection 2019.
6
Evaluation of host-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene markers as a complementary tool for detecting fecal pollution in a prairie watershed.评估宿主特异性拟杆菌目16S rRNA基因标记作为检测草原流域粪便污染的补充工具。
Water Res. 2009 Nov;43(19):4838-49. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.06.045. Epub 2009 Jun 27.
7
Assessment of multiple fecal contamination sources in surface waters using environmental mitochondrial DNA metabarcoding.利用环境线粒体 DNA 宏条形码评估地表水中的多种粪便污染来源。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Nov 10;898:165237. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165237. Epub 2023 Jul 16.
8
A case study characterizing animal fecal sources in surface water using a mitochondrial DNA marker.一项使用线粒体DNA标记物表征地表水中动物粪便来源的案例研究。
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Aug;189(8):406. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6107-z. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
9
Performance of forty-one microbial source tracking methods: a twenty-seven lab evaluation study.41 种微生物源追踪方法的性能评估:一项 27 个实验室的评估研究。
Water Res. 2013 Nov 15;47(18):6812-28. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.12.046. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
10
Distributions of Fecal Markers in Wastewater from Different Climatic Zones for Human Fecal Pollution Tracking in Australian Surface Waters.不同气候区废水中粪便标志物的分布,用于澳大利亚地表水人类粪便污染追踪
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Dec 18;82(4):1316-1323. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03765-15. Print 2016 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of Conditional Random Forest and Regression Models at Predicting Human Fecal Contamination of Produce Irrigation Ponds in the Southeastern United States.条件随机森林和回归模型在美国东南部预测农产品灌溉池塘人粪便污染方面的性能
ACS ES T Water. 2024 Nov 27;4(12):5844-5855. doi: 10.1021/acsestwater.4c00839.
2
Distributions of Fecal Indicators at Aquaculture Areas in a Bay of Republic of Korea.韩国某海湾水产养殖区粪便指示生物的分布状况。
J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024 Nov 28;34(11):2223-2230. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2406.06001. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
3
A novel droplet digital PCR human mtDNA assay for fecal source tracking.
一种新型的基于液滴数字 PCR 的人线粒体 DNA 检测方法,用于粪便溯源。
Water Res. 2020 Sep 15;183:116085. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116085. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
4
Landscape, Water Quality, and Weather Factors Associated With an Increased Likelihood of Foodborne Pathogen Contamination of New York Streams Used to Source Water for Produce Production.与纽约用于农产品生产水源的溪流中食源性病原体污染可能性增加相关的景观、水质和天气因素。
Front Sustain Food Syst. 2020 Feb;3. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00124. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
5
A case study characterizing animal fecal sources in surface water using a mitochondrial DNA marker.一项使用线粒体DNA标记物表征地表水中动物粪便来源的案例研究。
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Aug;189(8):406. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6107-z. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
6
Disinfection and removal of human pathogenic bacteria in arctic waste stabilization ponds.北极废物稳定塘中人类病原菌的消毒和去除。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Nov;25(33):32881-32893. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8816-9. Epub 2017 Mar 29.