Malo J L, L'Archevêque J, Cartier A
Department of Chest Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1989 Jan;83(1):159-65. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(89)90491-0.
Although late bronchospastic reactions after exposure to antigenic and sensitizing agents usually significantly alter bronchial responsiveness to histamine or methacholine, presumably by causing bronchial inflammation, isolated immediate bronchospastic reactions do not induce such changes. We studied three subjects who demonstrated different patterns of reaction. The first individual was diagnosed as having occupational asthma to red cedar. This was confirmed by specific inhalation challenges that resulted in late bronchospastic reaction. No significant changes in the provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) were found 1 day after this reaction. Two weeks later, serial assessments (five and six, respectively) of PC20 histamine were recorded on control days and up to 48 hours after exposure to plicatic acid, which caused a late bronchospastic reaction with a maximum fall of 37% in FEV1. No significant changes in PC20 were found; the maximum variations on control days were 0.36 to 0.74 mg/ml, and on active days, from 0.37 to 0.59 mg/ml. By contrast, two other subjects, who demonstrated isolated immediate reactions after exposure to diphenylmethane diisocyanate, had significant changes in PC20 histamine and methacholine, in one subject from 3.1 mg/ml to 0.6 mg/ml 8 hours after exposure, and in the other subject, from 61.0 to 7.4 mg/ml 7 hours after exposure, with recovery during the next few days. These examples demonstrate that the pattern of nonspecific bronchial responsiveness after immediate and late bronchospastic reactions can be different from what has previously been described. Immediate bronchospastic reactions may lead to bronchial hyperresponsiveness, whereas late asthmatic reactions do not always induce changes in bronchial responsiveness.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
尽管接触抗原性和致敏剂后出现的迟发性支气管痉挛反应通常会显著改变支气管对组胺或乙酰甲胆碱的反应性,推测是通过引起支气管炎症,但孤立的即时支气管痉挛反应不会引发此类变化。我们研究了三名表现出不同反应模式的受试者。第一名个体被诊断为对红雪松有职业性哮喘。通过特异性吸入激发试验确诊,该试验导致迟发性支气管痉挛反应。在该反应发生1天后,未发现引起FEV1下降20%的组胺激发浓度(PC20)有显著变化。两周后,在对照日以及接触导致FEV1最大下降37%的plicatic acid后长达48小时内,分别进行了5次和6次PC20组胺的系列评估。未发现PC20有显著变化;对照日的最大变化范围为0.36至0.74mg/ml,激发日为0.37至0.59mg/ml。相比之下,另外两名受试者在接触二苯基甲烷二异氰酸酯后表现出孤立的即时反应,其PC20组胺和乙酰甲胆碱有显著变化,一名受试者在接触后8小时从3.1mg/ml降至0.6mg/ml,另一名受试者在接触后7小时从61.0降至7.4mg/ml,并在接下来的几天内恢复。这些例子表明,即时和迟发性支气管痉挛反应后的非特异性支气管反应模式可能与先前描述的不同。即时支气管痉挛反应可能导致支气管高反应性,而迟发性哮喘反应并不总是引起支气管反应性的变化。(摘要截断于250字)