• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

交互目标动态

Transactive goal dynamics.

作者信息

Fitzsimons Gráinne M, Finkel Eli J, vanDellen Michelle R

机构信息

Fuqua School of Business, Duke University.

Department of Psychology, Northwestern University.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 2015 Oct;122(4):648-73. doi: 10.1037/a0039654.

DOI:10.1037/a0039654
PMID:26437147
Abstract

Transactive goal dynamics (TGD) theory conceptualizes 2 or more interdependent people as 1 single self-regulating system. Six tenets describe the nature of goal interdependence, predict its emergence, predict when it will lead to positive goal outcomes during and after the relationship, and predict the consequences for the relationship. Both partners in a TGD system possess and pursue self-oriented, partner-oriented, and system-oriented goals, and all of these goals and pursuits are interdependent. TGD theory states that relationship partners' goals, pursuit, and outcomes affect each other in a dense network of goal interdependence, ultimately becoming so tightly linked that the 2 partners are most accurately conceptualized as components within a single self-regulating system.

摘要

交互目标动态(TGD)理论将两个或更多相互依赖的人概念化为一个单一的自我调节系统。六个原则描述了目标相互依赖的本质,预测其出现,预测它在关系期间和之后何时会导致积极的目标结果,并预测对关系的影响。TGD系统中的双方都拥有并追求自我导向、伴侣导向和系统导向的目标,所有这些目标和追求都是相互依赖的。TGD理论指出,关系伙伴的目标、追求和结果在一个密集的目标相互依赖网络中相互影响,最终联系得如此紧密,以至于最准确地将这两个伙伴概念化为一个单一自我调节系统中的组成部分。

相似文献

1
Transactive goal dynamics.交互目标动态
Psychol Rev. 2015 Oct;122(4):648-73. doi: 10.1037/a0039654.
2
Power and the pursuit of a partner's goals.权力与对伴侣目标的追求。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Jun;110(6):840-68. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000048.
3
Close relationships and self-regulation: How relationship satisfaction facilitates momentary goal pursuit.亲密关系与自我调节:关系满意度如何促进即时目标追求。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Sep;109(3):434-52. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000020. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
4
When individual goal pursuit turns competitive: How we sabotage and coast.当个体目标追求变得具有竞争性时:我们如何破坏和懈怠。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Sep;117(3):605-620. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000170. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
5
Shifting dependence: the influence of partner instrumentality and self-esteem on responses to interpersonal risk.转移依赖:伴侣工具性和自尊对人际风险反应的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Jan;40(1):57-69. doi: 10.1177/0146167213503885. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
6
In good company: managing interpersonal resources that support self-regulation.与优秀者为伍:管理支持自我调节的人际资源。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Jun;41(6):869-82. doi: 10.1177/0146167215580778. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
7
The benefits of interpersonal regulatory fit for individual goal pursuit.人际调节适配对个体目标追求的益处。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Oct;101(4):720-36. doi: 10.1037/a0023592.
8
Extrinsic relative to intrinsic goal pursuits and peer dynamics: selection and influence processes among adolescents.外在目标追求与内在目标追求相对,以及同辈动态:青少年的选择和影响过程。
J Adolesc. 2013 Oct;36(5):925-33. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
9
Thinking of you: nonconscious pursuit of interpersonal goals associated with relationship partners.想念你:对与关系伙伴相关的人际目标的无意识追求。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Jan;84(1):148-64.
10
People as Means to Multiple Goals: Implications for Interpersonal Relationships.人作为实现多重目标的手段:对人际关系的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Oct;44(10):1487-1501. doi: 10.1177/0146167218769869. Epub 2018 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Parents' experiences of family-based physical activity interventions: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.父母对家庭体育活动干预措施的体验:一项系统评价与定性证据综合分析
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Jul 1;22(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01778-9.
2
Relationship closeness in the context of chronic pain: Daily benefits and challenges for partners.慢性疼痛背景下的亲密关系:伴侣的日常益处与挑战
Health Psychol. 2025 Sep;44(9):833-843. doi: 10.1037/hea0001481. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
3
Feasibility of dyadic peer support to augment a church-based healthy lifestyle programme.
二元同伴支持增强基于教会的健康生活方式计划的可行性。
Health Educ J. 2023 Nov;82(7):725-738. doi: 10.1177/00178969231185652. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
4
Emphasizing the in Emotion Regulation: A Call for Integration and Expansion.强调情绪调节中的[具体内容未给出]:整合与拓展的呼吁。
Affect Sci. 2024 Sep 7;5(3):173-178. doi: 10.1007/s42761-024-00260-2. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Couples-based health behavior change interventions: A relationship science perspective on the unique opportunities and challenges to improve dyadic health.基于夫妻的健康行为改变干预措施:从关系科学角度看改善二元健康的独特机遇与挑战。
Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2024 Jul 18;19:100250. doi: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2024.100250. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Partner-Involved Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation in Dual-Smoker Couples: A Randomized Pilot Trial.伴侣参与的戒烟经济激励在双吸烟伴侣中的随机试点试验
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Jan 22;26(2):229-236. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad183.
7
When thinking you are better leads to feeling worse: Self-other asymmetries in pro-social behavior and increased anxiety during Covid-19.当你认为自己更优秀会导致感觉更糟糕:Covid-19 期间亲社会行为中的自我-他人不对称和焦虑增加。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 14;18(9):e0291329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291329. eCollection 2023.
8
Effectiveness of a smartphone-enabled dyadic self-care programme (SDSCP) for stroke survivors and caregivers: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.基于智能手机的脑卒中患者及其照护者二元自我护理方案的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 4;13(9):e073016. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073016.
9
Trait and facet personality similarity and relationship and life satisfaction in romantic couples.浪漫情侣的特质与层面人格相似性、关系及生活满意度
J Res Pers. 2023 Jun;104. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104378. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
10
Flourishing Together: The Longitudinal Effect of Goal Coordination on Goal Progress and Life Satisfaction in Romantic Relationships.共同成长:目标协调对浪漫关系中目标进展和生活满意度的纵向影响
Int J Appl Posit Psychol. 2023 Mar 10:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s41042-023-00089-3.