Yu Ke-Da, Jiang Yi-Zhou, Hao Shuang, Shao Zhi-Ming
Department of Breast Surgery, Cancer Center and Cancer Institute, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 399 Ling-Ling Road, Shanghai, 200032, P. R. China.
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 5;13:254. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0496-z.
The clinical significance of progesterone receptor (PgR) expression in estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) breast cancer is controversial. Herein, we systemically investigate the clinicopathologic features, molecular essence, and endocrine responsiveness of ER-/PgR+/HER2- phenotype.
Four study cohorts were included. The first and second cohorts were from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (n = 67,932) and Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (n = 2,338), respectively, for clinicopathologic and survival analysis. The third and fourth cohorts were from two independent publicly available microarray datasets including 837 operable cases and 483 cases undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, respectively, for clinicopathologic and gene-expression analysis. Characterized genes defining subgroups within the ER-/PgR+/HER2- phenotype were determined and further validated.
Clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes of the ER-/PgR+ phenotype fell in between the ER+/PgR+ and ER-/PgR- phenotypes, but were more similar to ER-/PgR-. Among the ER-/PgR+ phenotype, 30% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17-42%, pooled by a fixed-effects method) were luminal-like and 59% (95% CI 45-72%, pooled by a fixed-effects method) were basal-like. We further refined the characterized genes for subtypes within the ER-/PgR+ phenotype and developed an immunohistochemistry-based method that could determine the molecular essence of ER-/PgR+ using three markers, TFF1, CK5, and EGFR. Either PAM50-defined or immunohistochemistry-defined basal-like ER-/PgR+ cases have a lower endocrine therapy sensitivity score compared with luminal-like ER-/PgR+ cases (P <0.0001 by Mann-Whitney test for each study set and P <0.0001 for pooled standardized mean difference in meta-analysis). Immunohistochemistry-defined basal-like ER-/PgR+ cases might not benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy (log-rank P = 0.61 for sufficient versus insufficient endocrine therapy).
The majority of ER-/PgR+/HER2- phenotype breast cancers are basal-like and associated with a lower endocrine therapy sensitivity score. Additional studies are needed to validate these findings.
孕激素受体(PgR)表达在雌激素受体阴性(ER-)乳腺癌中的临床意义存在争议。在此,我们系统地研究了ER-/PgR+/HER2-表型的临床病理特征、分子本质和内分泌反应性。
纳入四个研究队列。第一个和第二个队列分别来自监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库(n = 67,932)和复旦大学附属肿瘤医院(n = 2,338),用于临床病理和生存分析。第三个和第四个队列分别来自两个独立的公开可用微阵列数据集,包括837例可手术病例和483例接受新辅助化疗的病例,用于临床病理和基因表达分析。确定并进一步验证了定义ER-/PgR+/HER2-表型内亚组的特征基因。
ER-/PgR+表型的临床病理特征和生存结果介于ER+/PgR+和ER-/PgR-表型之间,但更类似于ER-/PgR-。在ER-/PgR+表型中,30%(95%置信区间[CI]17-42%,采用固定效应方法合并)为管腔样,59%(95%CI 45-72%,采用固定效应方法合并)为基底样。我们进一步完善了ER-/PgR+表型内亚型的特征基因,并开发了一种基于免疫组织化学的方法,该方法可以使用三种标志物TFF1、CK5和EGFR来确定ER-/PgR+的分子本质。与管腔样ER-/PgR+病例相比(每个研究组经Mann-Whitney检验P<0.0001,荟萃分析合并标准化平均差异P<0.0001),PAM50定义的或免疫组织化学定义的基底样ER-/PgR+病例的内分泌治疗敏感性评分较低。免疫组织化学定义的基底样ER-/PgR+病例可能无法从辅助内分泌治疗中获益(充分与不充分内分泌治疗的log-rank P = 0.61)。
大多数ER-/PgR+/HER2-表型乳腺癌为基底样,且内分泌治疗敏感性评分较低。需要进一步研究来验证这些发现。