Walker D, Gugenheim S, Downs M P, Northern J L
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262.
Pediatrics. 1989 Feb;83(2):284-8.
The purpose of this project was to evaluate the use of the Early Language Milestone Scale (ELM) in screening language skills in young children. In this study, 657 children from birth to 36 months of age were evaluated with the ELM. The overall failure rate was 8%. Children who failed the ELM screening were evaluated with the Sequenced Inventory of Communication Development (SICD) that was used as the "gold standard" for diagnosing language disorders. In the 12-month age and younger group, there was poor agreement between the ELM Scale and the SICD. For infants 13 to 24 months of age, there was moderately good agreement between the SICD and a second ELM that was administered 1 to 2 weeks after the initial screening. In the 25- to 36-month age group, there was excellent agreement between the SICD and a rescreen ELM. The agreement between the two instruments indicated that the rescreen ELM correctly classified 79% of the 13- to 24-month-old infants and 89% of the 25- to 36-month-old toddlers.
本项目的目的是评估早期语言里程碑量表(ELM)在筛查幼儿语言技能方面的应用。在本研究中,对657名年龄从出生到36个月的儿童进行了ELM评估。总体失败率为8%。ELM筛查未通过的儿童使用沟通发展序列量表(SICD)进行评估,该量表被用作诊断语言障碍的“金标准”。在12个月及以下年龄组中,ELM量表与SICD之间的一致性较差。对于13至24个月大的婴儿,在初次筛查后1至2周进行的第二次ELM与SICD之间有中度良好的一致性。在25至36个月年龄组中,SICD与重新筛查的ELM之间有极好的一致性。两种工具之间的一致性表明,重新筛查的ELM正确分类了79%的13至24个月大的婴儿和89%的25至36个月大的幼儿。