Muzyamba Choolwe, Broaddus Elena, Campbell Catherine
Independent Researcher, A9, Marshlands Village, PO Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia.
Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, USA.
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2015 Oct 5;15:26. doi: 10.1186/s12914-015-0067-6.
Human rights approaches now dominate the HIV prevention landscape across sub-Saharan Africa, yet little is known about how they are viewed by the populations they are designed to serve. Health interventions are most effective when they resonate with the worldviews and interests of target groups. This study examined local Zambian understandings of human rights approaches to HIV-prevention among three highly HIV-vulnerable groups: women, youth, and men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM).
Focus groups included 23 women, youth, and MSM who had participated in activities organized by local non-governmental organizations (NGOs) using rights-based approaches, and interviews included 10 Zambian employees of these NGOs. Topics included participants' experiences and views of the utility of these activities. Thematic analysis mapped out diverse ways participants viewed the concept of human rights in relation to HIV-prevention.
Whilst NGO workers noted the need for human rights programs to address the complex drivers of the HIV epidemic, they struggled to tailor them to the Zambian context due to donor stipulations. Women program beneficiaries noted that the concept of human rights helped challenge harmful sexual practices and domestic abuse, and youth described rights-based approaches as more participatory than previous HIV-prevention efforts. However, they criticized the approach for conflicting with traditional values such as respect for elders and 'harmonious' marital relationships. They also critiqued it for threatening the social structures and relationships that they relied on for material survival, and for failing to address issues like poverty and unemployment. In contrast, MSM embraced the rights approach, despite being critical of its overly confrontational implementation.
A rights-based approach seeks to tackle the symbolic drivers of HIV-its undeniable roots in cultural and religious systems of discrimination. Yet, it fails to resonate with youth and women's own understandings of their needs and priorities due to its neglect of material drivers of HIV such as poverty and unemployment. MSM, who suffer extreme stigma and discrimination, have less to lose and much to gain from an approach that challenges inequitable social systems. Developing effective HIV-prevention strategies requires careful dialogue with vulnerable groups and greater flexibility for context-specific implementation rather than a one-size-fits-all conceptualization of human rights.
人权方法如今在撒哈拉以南非洲的艾滋病预防领域占据主导地位,但对于这些方法在其旨在服务的人群中的看法却知之甚少。当健康干预措施与目标群体的世界观和利益相契合时,其效果最为显著。本研究调查了赞比亚当地三个艾滋病高风险群体——女性、青年以及男男性行为者(MSM)——对人权方法预防艾滋病的理解。
焦点小组包括23名参与过当地非政府组织(NGO)采用基于权利方法组织的活动的女性、青年和男男性行为者,访谈对象包括10名这些非政府组织的赞比亚雇员。话题包括参与者对这些活动效用的经历和看法。主题分析梳理了参与者在艾滋病预防方面看待人权概念的不同方式。
虽然非政府组织工作人员指出人权项目有必要应对艾滋病流行的复杂驱动因素,但由于捐助方的规定,他们难以将这些项目因地制宜地应用于赞比亚。女性项目受益人指出,人权概念有助于挑战有害的性行为和家庭暴力,青年将基于权利的方法描述为比以往的艾滋病预防工作更具参与性。然而,他们批评这种方法与诸如尊重长辈和“和谐”婚姻关系等传统价值观相冲突。他们还批评该方法威胁到他们赖以维持物质生存的社会结构和关系,且未能解决贫困和失业等问题。相比之下,男男性行为者接受基于权利的方法,尽管他们批评其实施方式过于对抗性。
基于权利的方法旨在解决艾滋病的象征性驱动因素——其在文化和宗教歧视体系中不可否认的根源。然而,由于忽视了艾滋病的物质驱动因素,如贫困和失业,它未能与青年和女性自身对其需求和优先事项的理解产生共鸣。遭受极端污名化和歧视的男男性行为者,从一种挑战不公平社会制度的方法中失去的较少,而获得的更多。制定有效的艾滋病预防策略需要与弱势群体进行认真对话,并在因地制宜的实施方面具有更大的灵活性,而不是对人权采取一刀切的概念化做法。