• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Selective alpha-blockade versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition as initial antihypertensive therapy. Effects on circulating lipoproteins.

作者信息

Takiyyuddin M A, Cervenka J H, Dinh T, Witztum J L, O'Connor D T

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1989 Jan 23;86(1B):32-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90126-5.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9343(89)90126-5
PMID:2643863
Abstract

This study evaluated the overall efficacy and safety of two specific vasodilators--the alpha-blocker prazosin and the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril--in the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Because the current approach to antihypertensive treatment should consider possible drug-related changes in circulating lipid fractions, the present study investigated the effects of these two drugs on lipid parameters as well. Used either as single agents or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide, both drugs effectively reduced high blood pressure. Neither drug had adverse effects on the lipid profile in general, although there were significant differences between the effects of prazosin and captopril on total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B.

摘要

相似文献

1
Selective alpha-blockade versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition as initial antihypertensive therapy. Effects on circulating lipoproteins.
Am J Med. 1989 Jan 23;86(1B):32-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90126-5.
2
Influence of combination of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide on plasma lipids, lipoproteins and apolipoproteins in primary hypertension.卡托普利与氢氯噻嗪联合应用对原发性高血压患者血脂、脂蛋白及载脂蛋白的影响
J Hum Hypertens. 1993 Apr;7(2):149-52.
3
The effects of antihypertensive combination therapy on lipid and glucose metabolism: hydrochlorothiazide plus sotalol vs. hydrochlorothiazide plus captopril.降压联合治疗对脂质和葡萄糖代谢的影响:氢氯噻嗪加索他洛尔与氢氯噻嗪加卡托普利的对比
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Jun;35(6):231-4.
4
Effect of prazosin and propranolol on lipoproteins of hypertensive patients.哌唑嗪和普萘洛尔对高血压患者脂蛋白的影响。
Biomed Biochim Acta. 1987;46(1):111-8.
5
Prazosin versus hydrochlorothiazide as initial antihypertensive therapy in black versus white patients.哌唑嗪与氢氯噻嗪作为黑人和白人患者初始抗高血压治疗药物的比较
Am J Med. 1989 Jan 23;86(1B):74-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90136-8.
6
Prazosin versus captopril as initial therapy. Effect on hypertension and lipid levels.
Am J Med. 1987 Jan 5;82(1A):58-63. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90146-x.
7
Effects of alpha- and beta-adrenergic antagonists on plasma apolipoproteins and forearm blood flow in patients with mild hypertension.α-和β-肾上腺素能拮抗剂对轻度高血压患者血浆载脂蛋白及前臂血流量的影响。
Am J Med. 1989 Jan 23;86(1B):8-13. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90121-6.
8
Comparison of the effect of indoramin and prazosin on blood pressure and lipid profiles in essential hypertension.吲哚拉明与哌唑嗪对原发性高血压患者血压及血脂影响的比较。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1986;8 Suppl 2:S53-5. doi: 10.1097/00005344-198600082-00011.
9
Evaluation of the effects of fixed combinations of sustained-release verapamil/trandolapril versus captopril/hydrochlorothiazide on metabolic and electrolyte parameters in patients with essential hypertension.
J Hum Hypertens. 2000 Jun;14(6):347-54. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001014.
10
Effect of alpha- and selective beta-blockade for hypertension control on plasma lipoproteins, apoproteins, lipoprotein subclasses, and postprandial lipemia.α受体阻滞剂和选择性β受体阻滞剂控制高血压对血浆脂蛋白、载脂蛋白、脂蛋白亚类及餐后血脂的影响。
Am J Med. 1989 Jan 23;86(1B):26-31. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90125-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of treatment with verapamil SR and captopril on the lipid profile of hypertensive patients.
Drugs. 1992;44 Suppl 1:88-93. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199200441-00016.