• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险选择危及特定患者的医疗质量:来自欧洲医疗保险交易所的教训。

Risk Selection Threatens Quality Of Care For Certain Patients: Lessons From Europe's Health Insurance Exchanges.

作者信息

van de Ven Wynand P M M, van Kleef Richard C, van Vliet Rene C J A

机构信息

Wynand P. M. M. van de Ven (

Richard C. van Kleef is an associate professor in the Institute of Health Policy and Management at Erasmus University.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Oct;34(10):1713-20. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1456.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1456
PMID:26438748
Abstract

Experience in European health insurance exchanges indicates that even with the best risk-adjustment formulas, insurers have substantial incentives to engage in risk selection. The potentially most worrisome form of risk selection is skimping on the quality of care for underpriced high-cost patients--that is, patients for whom insurers are compensated at a rate lower than the predicted health care expenses of these patients. In this article we draw lessons for the United States from twenty years of experience with health insurance exchanges in Europe, where risk selection is a serious problem. Mistakes by European legislators and inadequate evaluation criteria for risk selection incentives are discussed, as well as strategies to reduce risk selection and the complex trade-off among selection (through quality skimping), efficiency, and affordability. Recommended improvements to the risk-adjustment process in the United States include considering the adoption of risk adjusters used in Europe, investing in the collection of data, using a permanent form of risk sharing, and replacing the current premium "band" restrictions with more flexible restrictions. Policy makers need to understand the complexities of regulating competitive health insurance markets and to prevent risk selection that threatens the provision of good-quality care for underpriced high-cost patients.

摘要

欧洲健康保险交易所的经验表明,即便采用最完善的风险调整公式,保险公司仍有很大动机进行风险选择。风险选择最令人担忧的潜在形式是,保险公司会故意克扣那些保费定价偏低但成本较高患者的医疗服务质量,即保险公司获得的补偿低于这些患者预计医疗费用的患者。在本文中,我们从欧洲健康保险交易所二十年的经验中吸取教训,在欧洲,风险选择是一个严重问题。我们讨论了欧洲立法者所犯的错误以及风险选择激励措施的评估标准不足之处,还探讨了降低风险选择的策略以及在选择(通过克扣质量)、效率和可承受性之间的复杂权衡。对美国风险调整流程的改进建议包括考虑采用欧洲使用的风险调整因子、投资数据收集、采用永久性风险分担形式,并用更灵活的限制取代当前的保费“区间”限制。政策制定者需要了解监管竞争性健康保险市场的复杂性,并防止出现威胁到为保费定价偏低但成本较高患者提供优质医疗服务的风险选择行为。

相似文献

1
Risk Selection Threatens Quality Of Care For Certain Patients: Lessons From Europe's Health Insurance Exchanges.风险选择危及特定患者的医疗质量:来自欧洲医疗保险交易所的教训。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Oct;34(10):1713-20. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1456.
2
Health insurance exchanges in Switzerland and the Netherlands offer five key lessons for the operations of US exchanges.瑞士和荷兰的医疗保险交易所为美国交易所的运营提供了五个关键经验。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Apr;32(4):744-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0948.
3
Promoting Value for Consumers: Comparing Individual Health Insurance Markets Inside and Outside the ACA's Exchanges.为消费者提升价值:比较《平价医疗法案》交易所内外的个人健康保险市场。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016 Jun;12:1-10.
4
Did they come to the dance? Insurer participation in exchanges.他们来参加舞会了吗?保险公司参与医保交易所。
Am J Manag Care. 2014;20(12):1022-30.
5
Addressing health care market reform through an insurance exchange: essential policy components, the public plan option, and other issues to consider.通过保险交易所推进医疗保健市场改革:基本政策要素、公共计划选项及其他需考虑的问题。
EBRI Issue Brief. 2009 Jun(330):1-22.
6
Managing risk selection incentives in health sector reforms.在卫生部门改革中管理风险选择激励措施。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1999 Oct-Dec;14(4):287-311. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199910/12)14:4<287::AID-HPM560>3.0.CO;2-V.
7
How Insurers Competed in the Affordable Care Act's First Year.保险公司在《平价医疗法案》实施第一年的竞争方式。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 Jun;18:1-16.
8
What can Europe learn from the managed care backlash in the United States?欧洲能从美国管理式医疗的强烈抵制中学到什么?
Health Policy. 2016 May;120(5):509-18. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
9
Comparing Individual Health Coverage On and Off the Affordable Care Act's Insurance Exchanges.比较《平价医疗法案》保险交易所内外的个人医保覆盖情况。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 Aug;26:1-8.
10
Statutory health insurance competition in Europe: a four-country comparison.欧洲法定健康保险竞争:四国比较。
Health Policy. 2013 Mar;109(3):209-25. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A critical review of the use of R in risk equalization research.对R在风险均等化研究中的应用的批判性综述。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Apr;26(3):363-375. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01709-8. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
2
High-risk pooling for mitigating risk selection incentives in health insurance markets with sophisticated risk equalization: an application based on health survey information.高风险池在医疗保险市场中缓解复杂风险均衡的风险选择激励:基于健康调查信息的应用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 4;24(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10774-x.
3
Scope and Incentives for Risk Selection in Health Insurance Markets With Regulated Competition: A Conceptual Framework and International Comparison.
具有监管竞争的健康保险市场中的风险选择范围和激励措施:概念框架与国际比较。
Med Care Res Rev. 2024 Jun;81(3):175-194. doi: 10.1177/10775587231222584. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
4
Selection Incentives in the Dutch Basic Health Insurance: To What Extent Does End-of-Life Spending Contribute to Predictable Profits and Losses for Selective Groups?荷兰基本健康保险中的选择激励:临终支出在多大程度上为选择性群体的可预测盈亏做出贡献?
Med Care Res Rev. 2022 Dec;79(6):819-833. doi: 10.1177/10775587221099731. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
5
The goal of risk equalization in regulated competitive health insurance markets.调节性竞争健康保险市场中的风险均衡目标。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Feb;24(1):111-123. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01457-7. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
6
Association Between Provider-Sponsored Health Plan Ownership and Health Insurance Marketplace Plan Quality.提供者赞助的健康计划所有权与健康保险市场计划质量之间的关联。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(14):3603-3610. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07407-6. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
7
Incorporating self-reported health measures in risk equalization through constrained regression.通过约束回归将自我报告的健康措施纳入风险均等化。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jun;21(4):513-528. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01146-y. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
8
Modest risk-sharing significantly reduces health plans' incentives for service distortion.适度的风险分担显著降低了健康计划扭曲服务的动机。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Dec;20(9):1359-1374. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01102-w. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
9
Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data.初级保健中的风险选择:基于瑞典个体数据的横断面固定效应分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 23;8(10):e020402. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020402.
10
Risk equalization in competitive health insurance markets: Identifying healthy individuals on the basis of multiple-year low spending.竞争性健康保险市场中的风险均衡:基于多年低支出识别健康个体。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr;54(2):455-465. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13065. Epub 2018 Oct 16.