• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健中的风险选择:基于瑞典个体数据的横断面固定效应分析。

Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Department of Governance, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 23;8(10):e020402. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020402.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020402
PMID:30355789
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6224750/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess socioeconomic differences between patients registered with private and public primary healthcare centres.

DESIGN

Population-based cross-sectional study controlling for municipality and household.

SETTING

Swedish population-based socioeconomic data collected from Statistics Sweden linked with individual registration data from all 21 Swedish regions.

PARTICIPANTS

All individuals residing in Sweden on 31 December 2015 (n=9 851 017) were included in the study.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Registration with private versus public primary healthcare centres.

RESULTS

After controlling for municipality and household, individuals with higher socioeconomic status were more likely to be registered with a private primary healthcare provider. Individuals in the highest income quantile were 4.9 percentage points (13.7%) more likely to be registered with a private primary healthcare provider compared with individuals in the lowest income quantile. Individuals with 1-3 years of higher education were 4.7 percentage points more likely to be registered with a private primary healthcare provider compared with those with an incomplete primary education.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that there are notable differences in registration patterns, indicating a skewed distribution of patients and health risks between private and public primary healthcare providers. This suggests that risk selection behaviour occurs in the reformed Swedish primary healthcare system, foremost through location patterns.

摘要

目的

评估在私人和公共初级保健中心注册的患者之间的社会经济差异。

设计

基于人群的横断面研究,控制了市和家庭因素。

地点

从瑞典统计局收集的基于人群的社会经济数据,与来自瑞典所有 21 个地区的个人登记数据相关联。

参与者

所有于 2015 年 12 月 31 日居住在瑞典的人(n=9 851 017)均纳入研究。

主要结局指标

在私人和公共初级保健中心的注册情况。

结果

在控制了市和家庭因素后,社会经济地位较高的个体更有可能在私人初级保健提供者处注册。与收入最低的个体相比,收入最高的个体在私人初级保健提供者处注册的可能性高 4.9 个百分点(13.7%)。接受 1-3 年高等教育的个体在私人初级保健提供者处注册的可能性比未完成小学教育的个体高 4.7 个百分点。

结论

结果表明,注册模式存在显著差异,表明私人和公共初级保健提供者之间的患者和健康风险分布存在偏差。这表明,风险选择行为发生在改革后的瑞典初级保健系统中,主要通过位置模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f0/6224750/06b4cefdbde2/bmjopen-2017-020402f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f0/6224750/41916a17771d/bmjopen-2017-020402f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f0/6224750/a504720bb202/bmjopen-2017-020402f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f0/6224750/06b4cefdbde2/bmjopen-2017-020402f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f0/6224750/41916a17771d/bmjopen-2017-020402f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f0/6224750/a504720bb202/bmjopen-2017-020402f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04f0/6224750/06b4cefdbde2/bmjopen-2017-020402f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk selection in primary care: a cross-sectional fixed effect analysis of Swedish individual data.初级保健中的风险选择:基于瑞典个体数据的横断面固定效应分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 23;8(10):e020402. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020402.
2
Differences in unmet healthcare needs between public and private primary care providers: A population-based study.公共和私人初级保健提供者之间未满足的医疗保健需求的差异:基于人群的研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Jun;46(4):488-494. doi: 10.1177/1403494818762983. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
3
Socioeconomic status and geographical factors associated with active listing in primary care: a cross-sectional population study accounting for multimorbidity, age, sex and primary care.与初级保健中活跃登记相关的社会经济地位和地理因素:一项考虑多重疾病、年龄、性别和初级保健的横断面人群研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 9;7(6):e014984. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014984.
4
Free establishment of primary health care providers: effects on geographical equity.初级医疗服务提供者的自由设立:对地理公平性的影响
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan 23;16:28. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1259-z.
5
[Determinants of elders' choice between private and public health care providers].[老年人在私立和公立医疗服务提供者之间选择的决定因素]
Rev Saude Publica. 2004 Feb;38(1):113-20. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102004000100016. Epub 2004 Jan 30.
6
High use of private providers for first healthcare seeking by drug-resistant tuberculosis patients: a cross-sectional study in Yangon, Myanmar.耐药结核病患者首次就医时大量选择私立医疗机构:缅甸仰光的一项横断面研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 11;18(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3077-y.
7
Household utilization and expenditure on private and public health services in Vietnam.越南家庭对私营和公共卫生服务的利用情况及支出
Health Policy Plan. 2002 Mar;17(1):61-70. doi: 10.1093/heapol/17.1.61.
8
Public and private sector treatment of malaria in Lao PDR.老挝公私部门对疟疾的治疗情况。
Acta Trop. 2009 Dec;112(3):283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.08.013. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
9
Importance of healthcare utilization and multimorbidity level in choosing a primary care provider in Sweden.医疗保健利用情况和多重疾病水平在瑞典选择初级保健提供者中的重要性。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2014 Jun;32(2):99-105. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2014.929819.
10
Patient morbidity and management patterns of community-based primary health care services in Hong Kong.香港社区基层医疗服务的患者发病率及管理模式
Hong Kong Med J. 2011 Jun;17(3 Suppl 3):33-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A Framework for the Design of Risk-Adjustment Models in Health care Provider Payment Systems.医疗服务提供者支付系统中风险调整模型设计框架
Med Care Res Rev. 2025 Feb;82(1):43-57. doi: 10.1177/10775587241273355. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
2
Evaluating the impact of the 2010 Swedish choice reform in primary health care on avoidable hospitalization and socioeconomic inequities: an interrupted time series analysis using register data.评估 2010 年瑞典选择改革对初级卫生保健中可避免住院和社会经济不平等的影响:使用登记数据的中断时间序列分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 23;24(1):972. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11434-w.
3
Income-based differences in healthcare utilization in relation to mortality in the Swedish population between 2004-2017: A nationwide register study.

本文引用的文献

1
How Does Risk Selection Respond to Risk Adjustment? New Evidence from the Medicare Advantage Program.风险选择如何应对风险调整?来自医疗保险优势计划的新证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2014 Oct;104(10):3335-64. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.10.3335.
2
Income disparities in cardiovascular health across the lifespan.一生中心血管健康方面的收入差距。
SSM Popul Health. 2016 Nov 2;2:904-913. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.10.009. eCollection 2016 Dec.
3
Neighborhood socioeconomic status at the age of 40 years and ischemic stroke before the age of 50 years: A nationwide cohort study from Sweden.
2004-2017 年瑞典人群中基于收入的医疗保健利用与死亡率之间的关系:一项全国范围内的登记研究。
PLoS Med. 2023 Nov 16;20(11):e1004230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004230. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Fifteen years with patient choice and free establishment in Swedish primary healthcare: what do we know?十五年的瑞典基础医疗保健中的患者选择和自由设立:我们了解多少?
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Nov;50(7):852-863. doi: 10.1177/14034948221095365. Epub 2022 May 20.
40 岁时的邻里社会经济地位与 50 岁前的缺血性卒中:来自瑞典的全国队列研究。
Int J Stroke. 2017 Oct;12(8):815-826. doi: 10.1177/1747493017702663. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
4
Equity aspects of the Primary Health Care Choice Reform in Sweden - a scoping review.瑞典初级卫生保健选择改革的公平性问题——一项范围综述
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jan 28;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0524-z.
5
Nonpsychotic Mental Disorders in Teenage Males and Risk of Early Stroke: A Population-Based Study.青少年男性的非精神病性精神障碍与早期中风风险:一项基于人群的研究。
Stroke. 2016 Mar;47(3):814-21. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012504. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
6
Free establishment of primary health care providers: effects on geographical equity.初级医疗服务提供者的自由设立:对地理公平性的影响
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan 23;16:28. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1259-z.
7
Risk Selection Threatens Quality Of Care For Certain Patients: Lessons From Europe's Health Insurance Exchanges.风险选择危及特定患者的医疗质量:来自欧洲医疗保险交易所的教训。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Oct;34(10):1713-20. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1456.
8
Cream skimming and hospital transfers in a mixed public-private system.混合公私制中的奶油分离和医院转移。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 May;132:156-64. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.035. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
9
Risk selection in a regulated health insurance market: a review of the concept, possibilities and effects.受监管的健康保险市场中的风险选择:概念、可能性及影响综述
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Dec;13(6):743-52. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2013.841546.
10
Risk selection and cost shifting in a prospective physician payment system: evidence from Ontario.前瞻性医生支付系统中的风险选择与成本转移:来自安大略省的证据
Health Policy. 2014 Apr;115(2-3):249-57. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Oct 22.