Suppr超能文献

来那度胺治疗低危非5q缺失骨髓增生异常综合征患者时,在阿扎胞苷之前使用可产生更高的缓解率。

Lenalidomide Treatment for Lower Risk Nondeletion 5q Myelodysplastic Syndromes Patients Yields Higher Response Rates When Used Before Azacitidine.

作者信息

Zeidan Amer M, Al Ali Najla H, Padron Eric, Lancet Jeffrey, List Alan, Komrokji Rami S

机构信息

Section of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

Department of Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.

出版信息

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015 Nov;15(11):705-10. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2015.08.083. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lenalidomide and azanucleosides are commonly used to treat anemic patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS) without chromosome 5q deletion (non-del5q) after failure of treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). Nonetheless, response rates to lenalidomide after azanucleosides treatment failure and their optimal sequencing after failure of treatment with ESAs is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified patients with LR-MDS in the Moffitt Cancer Center Clinical Database who received lenalidomide and azacitidine after ESA treatment failure. Rates of erythroid hematologic improvement (HI-E) in patients who received lenalidomide first followed by azacitidine (group 1) and those who received lenalidomide after azacitidine (group 2) were examined according to the International Working Group 2006 criteria.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients (37 in group 1 and 26 in group 2) were identified. The HI-E rate with lenalidomide as first-line therapy was 38% versus only 12% when lenalidomide was used as second-line therapy (P = .04). There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS; median OS, 104 vs. 87 months, respectively; P = .55), rates of leukemic progression, or in HI-E rates after azacitidine use (38% when azacitidine was used after lenalidomide vs. 35% when azacitidine was administered before lenalidomide, P = .69).

CONCLUSION

Lenalidomide appears to yield a higher HI-E rate in non-del5q LR-MDS when used as first-line therapy after ESA treatments failure. If validated in larger cohorts, lenalidomide rather than azacitidine should be considered for first-line therapy after ESA treatment failure.

摘要

背景

来那度胺和氮杂核苷常用于治疗红细胞生成素刺激剂(ESA)治疗失败后的低危骨髓增生异常综合征(LR-MDS)且无5号染色体缺失(非del5q)的贫血患者。然而,氮杂核苷治疗失败后来那度胺的反应率以及ESA治疗失败后的最佳用药顺序尚不清楚。

患者与方法

我们在莫菲特癌症中心临床数据库中识别出ESA治疗失败后接受来那度胺和阿扎胞苷治疗的LR-MDS患者。根据国际工作组2006标准,检查先接受来那度胺治疗后接受阿扎胞苷治疗的患者(第1组)和接受阿扎胞苷治疗后接受来那度胺治疗的患者(第2组)的红系血液学改善(HI-E)率。

结果

共识别出63例患者(第1组37例,第2组26例)。来那度胺作为一线治疗时的HI-E率为38%,而作为二线治疗时仅为12%(P = 0.04)。总生存期(OS;中位OS分别为104个月和87个月;P = 0.55)、白血病进展率或阿扎胞苷使用后的HI-E率无显著差异(来那度胺后使用阿扎胞苷时为38%,阿扎胞苷前使用来那度胺时为35%,P = 0.69)。

结论

在ESA治疗失败后,来那度胺作为非del5q LR-MDS的一线治疗似乎能产生更高的HI-E率。如果在更大的队列中得到验证,ESA治疗失败后一线治疗应考虑用来那度胺而非阿扎胞苷。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验