Huebner Ruth A, Posze Lynn, Willauer Tina M, Hall Martin T
c Division of Behavioral Health, Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services , Frankfort , Kentucky , USA.
a Department for Community-Based Services, Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services , Frankfort , Kentucky , USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2015;50(10):1341-50. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2015.1013131. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
Although integrated programs between child welfare and substance abuse treatment are recommended for families with co-occurring child maltreatment and substance use disorders, implementing integrated service delivery strategies with fidelity is a challenging process.
This study of the first five years of the Sobriety Treatment and Recovery Team (START) program examines implementation fidelity using a model proposed by Carroll et al. (2007). The study describes the process of strengthening moderators of implementation fidelity, trends in adherence to START service delivery standards, and trends in parent and child outcomes.
Qualitative and quantitative measures were used to prospectively study three START sites serving 341 families with 550 parents and 717 children.
To achieve implementation fidelity to service delivery standards required a pre-service year and two full years of operation, persistent leadership, and facilitative actions that challenged the existing paradigm. Over four years of service delivery, the time from the child protective services report to completion of five drug treatment sessions was reduced by an average of 75 days. This trend was associated with an increase in parent retention, parental sobriety, and parent retention of child custody. Conclusions/Importance: Understanding the implementation processes necessary to establish complex integrated programs may support realistic allocation of resources. Although implementation fidelity is a moderator of program outcome, complex inter-agency interventions may benefit from innovative measures of fidelity that promote improvement without extensive cost and data collection burden. The implementation framework applied in this study was useful in examining implementation processes, fidelity, and related outcomes.
尽管对于同时存在儿童虐待和物质使用障碍的家庭,推荐采用儿童福利与药物滥用治疗相结合的项目,但要切实实施具有保真度的综合服务提供策略是一个具有挑战性的过程。
本研究对清醒治疗与康复团队(START)项目的头五年进行了考察,采用卡罗尔等人(2007年)提出的模型来检验实施保真度。该研究描述了强化实施保真度调节因素的过程、遵守START服务提供标准的趋势以及父母和儿童的结果趋势。
采用定性和定量措施对三个START服务点进行前瞻性研究,这些服务点为341个家庭提供服务,涉及550名父母和717名儿童。
要实现对服务提供标准的实施保真度,需要一个岗前服务年和两年的全面运营、持续的领导力以及挑战现有模式的促进性行动。在四年的服务提供过程中,从儿童保护服务报告到完成五次药物治疗疗程的时间平均减少了75天。这一趋势与父母留存率、父母戒酒率以及父母对子女监护权的保留率的提高相关。结论/重要性:了解建立复杂综合项目所需的实施过程可能有助于合理分配资源。尽管实施保真度是项目结果的一个调节因素,但复杂的跨机构干预措施可能受益于创新的保真度衡量方法,这些方法在不产生大量成本和数据收集负担的情况下促进改进。本研究中应用的实施框架有助于考察实施过程、保真度及相关结果。