Zhao Dong, McCoy Andrew P, Kleiner Brian M, Mills Thomas H, Lingard Helen
Myers-Lawson School of Construction, Virginia Tech, 1345 Perry Street, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
School of Property, Project, and Construction Management, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia.
Saf Sci. 2016 Feb;82:111-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.002.
Safety management in construction is an integral effort and its success requires inputs from all stakeholders across design and construction phases. Effective risk mitigation relies on the concordance of all stakeholders' risk perceptions. Many researchers have noticed the discordance of risk perceptions among critical stakeholders in safe construction work, however few have provided quantifiable evidence describing them. In an effort to fill this perception gap, this research performs an experiment that investigates stakeholder perceptions of risk in construction. Data analysis confirms the existence of such discordance, and indicates a trend in risk likelihood estimation. With risk perceptions from low to high, the stakeholders are architects, contractors/safety professionals, and engineers. Including prior studies, results also suggest that designers have improved their knowledge in building construction safety, but compared to builders they present more difficultly in reaching a consensus of perception. Findings of this research are intended to be used by risk management and decision makers to reassess stakeholders' varying judgments when considering injury prevention and hazard assessment.
建筑施工中的安全管理是一项不可或缺的工作,其成功需要设计和施工阶段所有利益相关者的投入。有效的风险缓解依赖于所有利益相关者风险认知的一致性。许多研究人员已经注意到安全施工工作中关键利益相关者之间风险认知的不一致,然而很少有人提供描述这些不一致的可量化证据。为了填补这一认知差距,本研究进行了一项实验,调查利益相关者对建筑施工风险的认知。数据分析证实了这种不一致的存在,并表明了风险可能性估计的一种趋势。从低到高的风险认知方面,利益相关者依次是建筑师、承包商/安全专业人员和工程师。结合先前的研究,结果还表明设计师在建筑施工安全方面的知识有所提高,但与建筑商相比,他们在达成认知共识方面面临更大困难。本研究的结果旨在供风险管理和决策者在考虑预防伤害和危害评估时重新评估利益相关者的不同判断。