Suppr超能文献

在择期结直肠手术中实施结直肠闭合综合措施后的手术部位感染率

Surgical Site Infection Rates Following Implementation of a Colorectal Closure Bundle in Elective Colorectal Surgeries.

作者信息

Ghuman Amandeep, Chan Tiffany, Karimuddin Ahmer A, Brown Carl J, Raval Manoj J, Phang P Terry

机构信息

1 Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 2 Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Nov;58(11):1078-82. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000455.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections of up to 27% are reported for colorectal surgery. Care bundles have been introduced to decrease surgical site infection rates, but are variable in composition.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether the addition of a "Colorectal Closure Bundle" in our Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway decreased surgical site infection rates.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective study of elective colon resections before and after the addition of a closure bundle.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a single academic institution.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing consecutive elective colon resections with primary anastomosis, December 2012 to July 31, 2014, enrolled in our Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway. Exclusion criteria were stoma creation and closure and preoperative chemoradiation.

INTERVENTION

The "Colorectal Closure Bundle," which includes a change in gown and gloves, redraping, wound lavage, and a new set of instruments for closure, was added to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathway.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome measured was surgical site infections as defined by CDC criteria.

RESULTS

Two hundred five patients were reviewed, 111 preintervention and 94 postintervention. Overall surgical site infection rates were 25.2% preintervention vs 26.6% postintervention (p = 0.82). Surgical site infections were subdivided into "superficial" and "deep and organ space" and were 14.4% and 10.8% preintervention vs 14.9% and 11.7% postintervention (p = not significant). Smoking and diabetes mellitus were found to be independently associated with surgical site infections on multivariate analysis, with adjusted odds ratios of 4.32 (95% CI, 1.70-10.94), p = 0.002, and 2.87 (95% CI 1.30-6.34), p = 0.009.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations include the retrospective nature of the study and the small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no change in surgical site infection rates after implementation of the "Colorectal Closure Bundle." Smoking and diabetes mellitus were the only significant risk factors associated with increased surgical site infections. Our infection rates remain high and further change in our perioperative protocol is needed.

摘要

背景

据报道,结直肠手术的手术部位感染率高达27%。已引入护理包以降低手术部位感染率,但护理包的组成各不相同。

目的

本研究旨在确定在我们的术后加速康复方案中增加一个“结直肠闭合护理包”是否能降低手术部位感染率。

设计

这是一项对添加闭合护理包前后的择期结肠切除术进行的回顾性研究。

地点

本研究在一家学术机构进行。

患者

2012年12月至2014年7月31日期间接受连续择期结肠切除术并进行一期吻合的患者,纳入我们的术后加速康复方案。排除标准为造口的创建与闭合以及术前放化疗。

干预措施

在术后加速康复方案中增加了“结直肠闭合护理包”,其中包括更换手术衣和手套、重新铺巾、伤口冲洗以及一套用于闭合的新器械。

主要观察指标

所测量的主要结局是按照美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)标准定义的手术部位感染。

结果

共对205例患者进行了评估,其中干预前111例,干预后94例。总体手术部位感染率在干预前为25.2%,干预后为26.6%(p = 0.82)。手术部位感染分为“表浅”和“深部及器官间隙”感染,干预前分别为14.4%和10.8%,干预后分别为14.9%和11.7%(p = 无显著差异)。多因素分析发现,吸烟和糖尿病与手术部位感染独立相关,校正后的比值比分别为4.32(95%可信区间,1.70 - 10.94),p = 0.002,以及2.87(95%可信区间1.30 - 6.34),p = 0.009。

局限性

局限性包括研究的回顾性性质和样本量小。

结论

实施 “结直肠闭合护理包” 后,手术部位感染率没有变化。吸烟和糖尿病是与手术部位感染增加相关的仅有的显著风险因素。我们的感染率仍然很高,需要对我们的围手术期方案进行进一步改变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验