Suppr超能文献

评估一套降低胃肠手术后手术切口部位感染的护理措施。

Evaluation of a bundle of care to reduce incisional surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery.

作者信息

Phelan Liam, Dilworth Mark P, Bhangu Aneel, Limbrick Jack W, King Stratton, Bowley Doug M, Hardy Katie

机构信息

Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

J Infect Prev. 2020 Mar;21(2):52-59. doi: 10.1177/1757177419892072. Epub 2019 Dec 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) is associated with morbidity, mortality and increased care costs; many SSIs are considered preventable. The aim of the present study was to test implementation of a pragmatic, evidence-based bundle designed to reduce incisional SSI after emergency laparotomy and elective major lower gastrointestinal surgery.

METHOD

This was a prospective before-and-after study. Data were collected before the intervention and for two separate subsequent time periods. An evidence-based bundle of care (BOC) was implemented; the primary outcome measure was incisional SSI at 30 days. The secondary outcome measure was 30-day unplanned readmissions. The initial post-intervention group, Group 2, assessed a variable number of potential impacting factors; however, due to funding and staffing levels the second post-bundle group, Group 3, focused on the core aspects of the BOC and rates of incisional SSI and readmission.

RESULTS

In total, 99 patients were included in the 'before' group; and 71 in Group 2 and 92 in Group 3, the post-intervention groups. The incisional SSI rate was 29.3% (29/99) before and 28.2% (20/71) in Group 2 (=0.873) and 21.7% (20/92) in Group 3 (=0.234) after the intervention. After adjustment for confounders, the care bundle was associated with a non-significant reduction in SSI (Group 2: odds ratio [OR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.45-1.93, =0.0843). However, it was associated with significantly reduced readmissions 18.1% (18/99) before versus 5.6% (4/71) in Group 2 (OR = 0.236, 95% CI = 0.077-0.72, =0.012) and 8.7% (8/92) in Group 3 (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.16-0.9, =0.029). Comparing the pre-bundle group to the post-bundle groups, there was an overall significant reduction in readmissions (=0.003). This implies a number needed to treat of 8-11 patients to prevent one readmission. Adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis with the Trust guidelines increased from 91% to 99% (1 vs. 2, =0.047).

CONCLUSION

Introduction of the bundle was associated with a reduction in the observed rate of incisional SSI from 29.3% to 21.7%; significantly fewer patients required unplanned readmission. Use of the bundle was associated with significantly improved compliance with appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis.

摘要

背景

手术部位感染(SSI)与发病率、死亡率及护理成本增加相关;许多SSI被认为是可预防的。本研究的目的是测试一种实用的、基于证据的综合措施的实施效果,该措施旨在降低急诊剖腹手术和择期低位胃肠道大手术后的切口SSI。

方法

这是一项前瞻性前后对照研究。在干预前以及随后两个不同时间段收集数据。实施了基于证据的护理综合措施(BOC);主要结局指标是30天时的切口SSI。次要结局指标是30天内的非计划再入院率。干预后的初始组,即第2组,评估了多个潜在影响因素;然而,由于资金和人员配备水平,综合措施实施后的第二组,即第3组,重点关注BOC的核心方面以及切口SSI和再入院率。

结果

“术前”组共纳入99例患者;干预后的第2组纳入71例,第3组纳入92例。干预前切口SSI率为29.3%(29/99),干预后第2组为28.2%(20/71)(P = 0.873),第3组为21.7%(20/92)(P = 0.234)。在对混杂因素进行调整后,护理综合措施与SSI的非显著降低相关(第2组:比值比[OR]=0.93,95%置信区间[CI]=0.45 - 1.93,P = 0.0843)。然而,它与再入院率显著降低相关,干预前为18.1%(18/99),第2组为5.6%(4/71)(OR = 0.236,95% CI = 0.077 - 0.72,P = 0.012),第3组为8.7%(8/92)(OR = 见0.38,95% CI = 0.16 - 0.9,P = 0.029)。将综合措施实施前的组与实施后的组进行比较,再入院率总体显著降低(P = 0.003)。这意味着预防一例再入院需要治疗8 - 11例患者。遵循信托指南进行抗生素预防的依从性从91%提高到了99%(第1组对第2组,P = 0.047)。

结论

引入综合措施与观察到的切口SSI率从29.3%降至21.7%相关;需要非计划再入院的患者显著减少。使用综合措施与适当抗菌预防的依从性显著提高相关。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验