Phelan Liam, Dilworth Mark P, Bhangu Aneel, Limbrick Jack W, King Stratton, Bowley Doug M, Hardy Katie
Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
J Infect Prev. 2020 Mar;21(2):52-59. doi: 10.1177/1757177419892072. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
Surgical site infection (SSI) is associated with morbidity, mortality and increased care costs; many SSIs are considered preventable. The aim of the present study was to test implementation of a pragmatic, evidence-based bundle designed to reduce incisional SSI after emergency laparotomy and elective major lower gastrointestinal surgery.
This was a prospective before-and-after study. Data were collected before the intervention and for two separate subsequent time periods. An evidence-based bundle of care (BOC) was implemented; the primary outcome measure was incisional SSI at 30 days. The secondary outcome measure was 30-day unplanned readmissions. The initial post-intervention group, Group 2, assessed a variable number of potential impacting factors; however, due to funding and staffing levels the second post-bundle group, Group 3, focused on the core aspects of the BOC and rates of incisional SSI and readmission.
In total, 99 patients were included in the 'before' group; and 71 in Group 2 and 92 in Group 3, the post-intervention groups. The incisional SSI rate was 29.3% (29/99) before and 28.2% (20/71) in Group 2 (=0.873) and 21.7% (20/92) in Group 3 (=0.234) after the intervention. After adjustment for confounders, the care bundle was associated with a non-significant reduction in SSI (Group 2: odds ratio [OR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.45-1.93, =0.0843). However, it was associated with significantly reduced readmissions 18.1% (18/99) before versus 5.6% (4/71) in Group 2 (OR = 0.236, 95% CI = 0.077-0.72, =0.012) and 8.7% (8/92) in Group 3 (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.16-0.9, =0.029). Comparing the pre-bundle group to the post-bundle groups, there was an overall significant reduction in readmissions (=0.003). This implies a number needed to treat of 8-11 patients to prevent one readmission. Adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis with the Trust guidelines increased from 91% to 99% (1 vs. 2, =0.047).
Introduction of the bundle was associated with a reduction in the observed rate of incisional SSI from 29.3% to 21.7%; significantly fewer patients required unplanned readmission. Use of the bundle was associated with significantly improved compliance with appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis.
手术部位感染(SSI)与发病率、死亡率及护理成本增加相关;许多SSI被认为是可预防的。本研究的目的是测试一种实用的、基于证据的综合措施的实施效果,该措施旨在降低急诊剖腹手术和择期低位胃肠道大手术后的切口SSI。
这是一项前瞻性前后对照研究。在干预前以及随后两个不同时间段收集数据。实施了基于证据的护理综合措施(BOC);主要结局指标是30天时的切口SSI。次要结局指标是30天内的非计划再入院率。干预后的初始组,即第2组,评估了多个潜在影响因素;然而,由于资金和人员配备水平,综合措施实施后的第二组,即第3组,重点关注BOC的核心方面以及切口SSI和再入院率。
“术前”组共纳入99例患者;干预后的第2组纳入71例,第3组纳入92例。干预前切口SSI率为29.3%(29/99),干预后第2组为28.2%(20/71)(P = 0.873),第3组为21.7%(20/92)(P = 0.234)。在对混杂因素进行调整后,护理综合措施与SSI的非显著降低相关(第2组:比值比[OR]=0.93,95%置信区间[CI]=0.45 - 1.93,P = 0.0843)。然而,它与再入院率显著降低相关,干预前为18.1%(18/99),第2组为5.6%(4/71)(OR = 0.236,95% CI = 0.077 - 0.72,P = 0.012),第3组为8.7%(8/92)(OR = 见0.38,95% CI = 0.16 - 0.9,P = 0.029)。将综合措施实施前的组与实施后的组进行比较,再入院率总体显著降低(P = 0.003)。这意味着预防一例再入院需要治疗8 - 11例患者。遵循信托指南进行抗生素预防的依从性从91%提高到了99%(第1组对第2组,P = 0.047)。
引入综合措施与观察到的切口SSI率从29.3%降至21.7%相关;需要非计划再入院的患者显著减少。使用综合措施与适当抗菌预防的依从性显著提高相关。