Tjia Jennifer, Reidenberg Marcus M, Hunnicutt Jacob N, Paice Kelli, Donovan Jennifer L, Kanaan Abir, Briesacher Becky A, Lapane Kate L
University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Consult Pharm. 2015 Oct;30(10):599-611. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2015.599.
Little is known about how to best taper antipsychotics used in patients with dementia. To address this gap, we reviewed published antipsychotic discontinuation trials to summarize what is known about tapering strategies for antipsychotics used with older adults with dementia. We further developed pharmacokinetic-based gradual dose reduction (GDR) protocols based on antipsychotic half-lives.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts were searched up to October 2014 to identify intervention studies reporting the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia outcomes resulting from discontinued off-label use of antipsychotics in nursing facility populations. Recently published pharmacokinetic reviews and standard pharmacology texts were used to determine antipsychotic drug half-lives for the pharmacokinetic-based GDR protocols.
For the review, studies with an intervention resulting in antipsychotic medication discontinuation or tapering were eligible, including randomized controlled trials and pre- and post-intervention studies.
When available, we extracted the protocols used for antipsychotic GDR from each study included in the review.
We found that clinical trials used different approaches to antipsychotic discontinuation, including abrupt discontinuation, slow tapers (more than two weeks), and mixed strategies based on drug dosage. None of the published trials described an approach based on pharmacokinetic principles. We developed a two-stage GDR protocol for tapering antipsychotic medications based on the log dose-response relationship; each stage was designed to result in a 50% dose reduction prior to discontinuation. This pharmacologically based strategy for patients chronically prescribed antipsychotics resulted in recommendations for slow tapers.
Our theoretically derived GDR recommendations suggest a different approach than previously published in clinical trials. Further study is needed to evaluate the effect of this approach on patients.
对于如何最佳地逐渐减少用于痴呆患者的抗精神病药物,人们了解甚少。为填补这一空白,我们回顾了已发表的抗精神病药物停药试验,以总结关于用于老年痴呆患者的抗精神病药物逐渐减量策略的已知情况。我们还根据抗精神病药物的半衰期制定了基于药代动力学的逐渐减量(GDR)方案。
检索了截至2014年10月的MEDLINE、EMBASE和国际药学文摘,以确定报告在护理机构人群中因非标签使用抗精神病药物停药导致的痴呆行为和心理症状结局的干预研究。最近发表的药代动力学综述和标准药理学教材用于确定基于药代动力学的GDR方案的抗精神病药物半衰期。
对于该综述,导致抗精神病药物停药或逐渐减量的干预研究符合条件,包括随机对照试验以及干预前和干预后研究。
如有可能,我们从综述中纳入的每项研究中提取用于抗精神病药物GDR的方案。
我们发现临床试验使用了不同的抗精神病药物停药方法,包括突然停药、缓慢减量(超过两周)以及基于药物剂量的混合策略。已发表的试验均未描述基于药代动力学原理的方法。我们基于对数剂量反应关系制定了一个两阶段的抗精神病药物逐渐减量GDR方案;每个阶段旨在在停药前使剂量减少50%。这种基于药理学的针对长期服用抗精神病药物患者的策略得出了缓慢减量的建议。
我们从理论上推导得出的GDR建议提出了一种与此前临床试验中发表的方法不同的方法。需要进一步研究来评估这种方法对患者的影响。