Stulberg B N, Bauer T W, Watson J T, Richmond B
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44106.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Mar(240):200-5.
Bone quality is an accepted criterion for determining fixation options for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Eighty patients with 95 uncemented THAs were evaluated by comparing preoperative roentgenographic assessment with histologic evaluation of bone biopsy specimens obtained from the ipsilateral iliac crest. Roentgenographic analysis of bone quality was performed using the Singh and Engh indices. Histologic evaluation employed a quantitative analysis of static and dynamic parameters of bone turnover on undecalcified sections. Extensive statistical analysis comparing roentgenographic with histologic parameters of bone quality showed: (1) no relationship of the two roentgenographic indices to trabecular bone volume and most other histologic parameters and (2) a high incidence of bone abnormalities. Bone quality is an imprecise term and is inadequately measured by these roentgenographic indices. Histologic measurement offers a more precise means of analyzing the relationship of the bone environment to the performance of the THA.
骨质量是确定全髋关节置换术(THA)固定方式的公认标准。通过将术前X线评估与从同侧髂嵴获取的骨活检标本的组织学评估进行比较,对80例患者的95例非骨水泥型THA进行了评估。使用辛格(Singh)指数和恩格(Engh)指数对骨质量进行X线分析。组织学评估采用对未脱钙切片上骨转换的静态和动态参数进行定量分析。对骨质量的X线参数与组织学参数进行广泛的统计分析表明:(1)两种X线指数与小梁骨体积及大多数其他组织学参数均无相关性;(2)骨异常发生率高。骨质量是一个不精确的术语,这些X线指数对其测量并不充分。组织学测量为分析骨环境与THA性能之间的关系提供了一种更精确的方法。