Schaefer Jared A, Mlekoday Tamara J
INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73112.
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;33(12):1805-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.08.050. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
Prompt and effective analgesia is a mainstay of emergency department (ED) medicine; however, it is often delayed in times of overcrowding and by the need to establish intravenous (IV) access. Thus, noninvasive analgesic administration by means of the intranasal route could potentially reduce time to analgesic administration by eliminating IV line insertion.
This retrospective study evaluated time from physician entry into patient's room to opioid administration after implementation of an intranasal fentanyl protocol. Data were collected on pediatric patients who received intranasal fentanyl in the ED 225 days after protocol implementation. Time to opioid administration was then evaluated against historical controls given IV opioids in the same ED 90 days before protocol implementation.
Seven patients were included in the intranasal fentanyl group and were evaluated against 47 patients given IV opioids. Time from physician entry into patient's room to opioid administration was significantly reduced for intranasal fentanyl (20.43 ± 11.54 minutes) vs IV opioids (42.04 ± 31.55 minutes; P = .002), and IV line insertion was avoided in all 7 intranasal fentanyl patients. No significant differences in adverse events were noted.
This study provides evidence that administration of fentanyl via the intranasal route in the ED decreases time to administration of opioids in pediatric patients.
及时有效的镇痛是急诊科医疗的关键;然而,在人满为患的情况下以及需要建立静脉通路时,镇痛往往会延迟。因此,通过鼻内途径进行无创镇痛给药有可能通过省去静脉穿刺来缩短镇痛给药时间。
这项回顾性研究评估了在实施鼻内芬太尼方案后,从医生进入患者病房到给予阿片类药物的时间。收集了在方案实施225天后在急诊科接受鼻内芬太尼治疗的儿科患者的数据。然后将阿片类药物给药时间与在方案实施前90天在同一急诊科接受静脉阿片类药物治疗的历史对照患者进行比较。
鼻内芬太尼组纳入了7名患者,并与47名接受静脉阿片类药物治疗的患者进行比较。鼻内给予芬太尼时,从医生进入患者病房到给予阿片类药物的时间(20.43±11.54分钟)显著短于静脉给予阿片类药物的时间(42.04±31.55分钟;P = 0.002),并且7名鼻内给予芬太尼的患者均避免了静脉穿刺。未观察到不良事件有显著差异。
本研究提供了证据,表明在急诊科通过鼻内途径给予芬太尼可缩短儿科患者阿片类药物的给药时间。