• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院前急救服务和急诊科中鼻内芬太尼用于儿童、成人和老年患者急性疼痛管理的系统评价

Intranasal Fentanyl for Acute Pain Management in Children, Adults and Elderly Patients in the Prehospital Emergency Service and in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Serra Sossio, Spampinato Michele Domenico, Riccardi Alessandro, Guarino Mario, Pavasini Rita, Fabbri Andrea, De Iaco Fabio

机构信息

Emergency Department, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, 47521 Cesena, Italy.

Department of Translational Medicine and for Romagna, University of Ferrara, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 30;12(7):2609. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072609.

DOI:10.3390/jcm12072609
PMID:37048692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10095441/
Abstract

This systematic review examined the efficacy and safety of intranasal fentanyl (INF) for acute pain treatment in children, adults, and the elderly in prehospital emergency services (PHES) and emergency departments (ED). ClinicalTrials.gov, LILACS, PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases were consulted until 31 December 2022. A total of 23 studies were included: 18 in children (1 PHES, 17 ED), 5 in adults (1 PHES, 4 ED) and 1 in older people (1 PHES subgroup analysis). In children, INF was effective in both settings and as effective as the comparator drugs, with no differences in adverse events (AEs); one randomised controlled trial (RCT) showed that INF was more effective than the comparator drugs. In adults, one study demonstrated the efficacy of INF in the PHES setting, one study demonstrated the efficacy of INF in the ED setting, two RCTs showed INF to be less effective than the comparator drugs and one RCT showed INF to be as effective as the comparator, with no difference in AEs reported. In older people, one study showed effective pain relief and no AEs. In summary, INF appears to be effective and safe in children and adults in PHES and ED. More high-quality studies are needed, especially in PHES and older people.

摘要

本系统评价考察了鼻内芬太尼(INF)在院前急救服务(PHES)和急诊科(ED)中用于儿童、成人及老年人急性疼痛治疗的有效性和安全性。检索了ClinicalTrials.gov、LILACS、PubMed、SCOPUS、EMBASE、谷歌学术和Cochrane数据库,检索截止至2022年12月31日。共纳入23项研究:18项针对儿童(1项在PHES,17项在ED),5项针对成人(1项在PHES,4项在ED),1项针对老年人(1项PHES亚组分析)。在儿童中,INF在两种环境下均有效,且与对照药物效果相当,不良事件(AE)无差异;一项随机对照试验(RCT)表明INF比对照药物更有效。在成人中,一项研究证明了INF在PHES环境中的有效性,一项研究证明了INF在ED环境中的有效性,两项RCT显示INF比对照药物效果差,一项RCT显示INF与对照药物效果相当,报告的AE无差异。在老年人中,一项研究显示疼痛缓解有效且无AE。总之,INF在PHES和ED中的儿童和成人中似乎有效且安全。需要更多高质量的研究,尤其是在PHES和老年人中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab60/10095441/e6280ea761b0/jcm-12-02609-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab60/10095441/e6280ea761b0/jcm-12-02609-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab60/10095441/e6280ea761b0/jcm-12-02609-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Intranasal Fentanyl for Acute Pain Management in Children, Adults and Elderly Patients in the Prehospital Emergency Service and in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review.院前急救服务和急诊科中鼻内芬太尼用于儿童、成人和老年患者急性疼痛管理的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 30;12(7):2609. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072609.
2
Intranasal fentanyl for the management of acute pain in children.鼻内给予芬太尼用于儿童急性疼痛的管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 10;2014(10):CD009942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009942.pub2.
3
Limited evidence for intranasal fentanyl in the emergency department and the prehospital setting--a systematic review.急诊科和院前环境中鼻内芬太尼的证据有限——一项系统评价。
Dan Med J. 2013 Jan;60(1):A4563.
4
Intranasal fentanyl for the prehospital management of acute pain in children.鼻腔内给予芬太尼用于儿童院前急性疼痛的管理。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;24(6):450-454. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000389.
5
Intranasal Fentanyl versus Subcutaneous Fentanyl for Pain Management in Prehospital Patients with Acute Pain: A Retrospective Analysis.鼻内芬太尼与皮下芬太尼用于院前急性疼痛患者的疼痛管理:回顾性分析。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Nov-Dec;24(6):760-768. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1704323. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Intranasal fentanyl spray versus intravenous opioids for the treatment of severe pain in patients with cancer in the emergency department setting: A randomized controlled trial.鼻腔内芬太尼喷雾与静脉内阿片类药物治疗急诊癌症患者重度疼痛的随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 10;15(7):e0235461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235461. eCollection 2020.
8
Pediatric emergency department triage-based pain guideline utilizing intranasal fentanyl: Effect of implementation.儿科急诊分诊为基础的疼痛指南利用鼻腔芬太尼:实施效果。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Sep;36(9):1603-1607. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.042. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
9
The Effectiveness of Ketamine Compared to Opioid Analgesics for management of acute pain in Children in The Emergency Department: systematic Review.氯胺酮与阿片类镇痛药在急诊科儿童急性疼痛管理中的疗效比较:系统评价。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Nov;61:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
10
Intranasal fentanyl versus intravenous morphine in the emergency department treatment of severe painful sickle cell crises in children: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.鼻腔内芬太尼与静脉内吗啡在急诊科治疗儿童严重疼痛性镰状细胞危象中的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 May 30;13:74. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-74.

引用本文的文献

1
AEROfen: protocol for a phase I, open-label, randomised crossover study evaluating the efficiency of nebulised fentanyl in healthy volunteers - comparing facial versus intranasal administration via pharmacometric modelling.AEROfen:一项I期开放标签随机交叉研究的方案,该研究评估雾化芬太尼在健康志愿者中的有效性——通过药代动力学建模比较经面部给药与经鼻给药。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 3;15(7):e091125. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091125.
2
In-dwelling microfluidic device for precise and reliable intranasal drug delivery during freely-moving behavior.用于在自由活动行为期间进行精确且可靠的鼻内给药的植入式微流控装置。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 28:2025.05.23.655803. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.23.655803.
3

本文引用的文献

1
IF IM in a crisis: Intranasal fentanyl versus intravenous morphine in adult vaso-occlusive crisis.如果我处于危机中:成人血管闭塞性危机中鼻内芬太尼与静脉注射吗啡的比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb;64:86-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.11.026. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
2
Intranasal Fentanyl to Reduce Pain and Improve Oral Intake in the Management of Children With Painful Infectious Mouth Lesions.鼻腔内给予芬太尼以减轻疼痛并改善患有疼痛性传染性口腔病变儿童的经口摄入。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Aug 1;38(8):363-366. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002779. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
3
Intranasal ketamine versus intranasal fentanyl on pain management in isolated traumatic patients.
Fentanyl or esketamine for traumatic pain (FORE-PAIN) trial: study protocol for a double-blind multi-arm randomized non-inferiority trial.
芬太尼或艾司氯胺酮用于创伤性疼痛(FORE-PAIN)试验:一项双盲多臂随机非劣效性试验的研究方案
Trials. 2025 May 26;26(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08869-9.
4
propofol permeation across nasal mucosa: A proof-of-concept study for outpatient light sedation via nasal route.丙泊酚经鼻黏膜渗透:一项关于经鼻途径用于门诊浅镇静的概念验证研究。
ADMET DMPK. 2024 Aug 16;12(5):759-768. doi: 10.5599/admet.2403. eCollection 2024.
5
Pain Management in Children Admitted to the Emergency Room: A Narrative Review.急诊室收治儿童的疼痛管理:一项叙述性综述
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Aug 18;16(8):1178. doi: 10.3390/ph16081178.
鼻内注射氯胺酮与鼻内注射芬太尼用于孤立性创伤患者疼痛管理的比较
J Res Med Sci. 2022 Jan 29;27:1. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_505_20. eCollection 2022.
4
The Safety of High-Dose Intranasal Fentanyl in the Pediatric Emergency Department.高剂量鼻腔内芬太尼在儿科急诊中的安全性。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Feb 1;38(2):e447-e450. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002627.
5
The effectiveness and safety of paediatric prehospital pain management: a systematic review.儿科院前疼痛管理的有效性和安全性:系统评价。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Dec 11;29(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00974-3.
6
Different routes of administration in chronic migraine prevention lead to different placebo responses: a meta-analysis.不同的慢性偏头痛预防给药途径导致不同的安慰剂反应:一项荟萃分析。
Pain. 2022 Mar 1;163(3):415-424. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002365.
7
The mediating effect of pain catastrophizing on pain intensity: The influence of the timing of assessments.疼痛灾难化对疼痛强度的中介作用:评估时间的影响。
Eur J Pain. 2021 Oct;25(9):1938-1947. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1810. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
8
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
9
Prediction of Opioid-Induced Respiratory Depression on Inpatient Wards Using Continuous Capnography and Oximetry: An International Prospective, Observational Trial.使用连续二氧化碳描记法和血氧定量法预测住院病房中阿片类药物引起的呼吸抑制:一项国际前瞻性观察性试验。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Oct;131(4):1012-1024. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004788.
10
The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises.修订后的国际疼痛研究协会疼痛定义:概念、挑战和妥协。
Pain. 2020 Sep 1;161(9):1976-1982. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939.