Zhao Xin, Brown Tristan R, Tyner Wallace E
Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Department of Forest and Natural Resources Management, SUNY-ESF, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
Bioresour Technol. 2015 Dec;198:755-63. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.056. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
This study evaluates the economic feasibility and stochastic dominance rank of eight cellulosic biofuel production pathways (including gasification, pyrolysis, liquefaction, and fermentation) under technological and economic uncertainty. A techno-economic assessment based financial analysis is employed to derive net present values and breakeven prices for each pathway. Uncertainty is investigated and incorporated into fuel prices and techno-economic variables: capital cost, conversion technology yield, hydrogen cost, natural gas price and feedstock cost using @Risk, a Palisade Corporation software. The results indicate that none of the eight pathways would be profitable at expected values under projected energy prices. Fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing (FPH) has the lowest breakeven fuel price at 3.11$/gallon of gasoline equivalent (0.82$/liter of gasoline equivalent). With the projected energy prices, FPH investors could expect a 59% probability of loss. Stochastic dominance is done based on return on investment. Most risk-averse decision makers would prefer FPH to other pathways.
本研究评估了在技术和经济不确定性下,八种纤维素生物燃料生产途径(包括气化、热解、液化和发酵)的经济可行性和随机优势排名。采用基于技术经济评估的财务分析来得出每种途径的净现值和盈亏平衡价格。利用Palisade Corporation软件@Risk对不确定性进行研究,并将其纳入燃料价格和技术经济变量:资本成本、转化技术产率、氢气成本、天然气价格和原料成本。结果表明,在预计能源价格下,这八种途径按预期值计算均无盈利。快速热解和加氢处理(FPH)的盈亏平衡燃料价格最低,为3.11美元/加仑汽油当量(0.82美元/升汽油当量)。按照预计能源价格,FPH投资者可能有59%的亏损概率。随机优势是基于投资回报率进行的。大多数风险规避型决策者会比其他途径更喜欢FPH。