Dilisio Matthew F, May Nolan R, Vincent Scott A, High Robin R, Walker Craig W, Manzer Melissa N, Apker Kim A, Fehringer Edward V
Creighton University Orthopaedics, CHI Health Alegent Creighton Clinic, Omaha, NE, USA.
New West Sports Medicine & Orthopaedics, Kearney, NE, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Mar;25(3):442-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
Radiolucent lines surrounding prosthetic glenoid components are commonly seen after unconstrained total shoulder arthroplasty and can be a harbinger of subsequent glenoid component failure. Whether less than 100% glenoid seating is associated with the development of radiolucent lines around glenoid prostheses is unknown. This study investigated the association between incomplete glenoid component seating and periprosthetic glenoid radiolucencies.
Thirty-six unconstrained total shoulder arthroplasties were performed in 29 patients for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with a minimum 2-year follow-up. All were implanted with a partially cemented all-polyethylene glenoid prosthesis. Patients were evaluated with standardized plain films preoperatively and postoperatively and with thin-cut computed tomography (CT) scans at the latest follow-up. The Lazarus and Yian classifications were used to assess radiolucency and seating on radiographs and CT scans. Ratings were calculated for intraobserver and interobserver reliability and given κ, the Kendall coefficient, and interclass correlation coefficient values.
At a mean of 43 months (range 24-26 months) after surgery, neither Lazarus plain film radiolucency scores (P = .78) nor Yian CT radiolucency scores (P = .68) were associated with Lazarus plain film seating scores. Neither Lazarus plain film radiolucency scores (P = .25) nor Yian CT radiolucency scores (P = .91) were associated with modified Lazarus CT scan seating scores. CT allowed for better intraobserver and interobserver reliability in all categories.
Radiolucencies around a partially cemented glenoid component were not associated with the degree of component seating. Complete seating of the glenoid component is not necessary to achieve radiographic implant stability at a mean follow-up of 43 months.
在非限制性全肩关节置换术后,假体盂周围出现的透亮线很常见,并且可能是随后盂假体失败的先兆。假体盂小于100%的就位是否与假体盂周围透亮线的形成相关尚不清楚。本研究调查了假体盂组件就位不完全与假体周围盂透亮线之间的关联。
对29例原发性盂肱关节炎患者进行了36例非限制性全肩关节置换术,随访至少2年。所有患者均植入了部分骨水泥固定的全聚乙烯假体盂。术前和术后用标准化平片对患者进行评估,并在最新随访时进行薄层计算机断层扫描(CT)。使用拉撒路(Lazarus)和伊安(Yian)分类法在X线片和CT扫描上评估透亮线和就位情况。计算观察者内和观察者间的可靠性评分,并给出κ值、肯德尔系数和组内相关系数值。
术后平均43个月(范围24 - 62个月)时,拉撒路平片透亮线评分(P = 0.78)和伊安CT透亮线评分(P = 0.68)均与拉撒路平片就位评分无关。拉撒路平片透亮线评分(P = 0.25)和伊安CT透亮线评分(P = 0.91)均与改良拉撒路CT扫描就位评分无关。CT在所有类别中观察者内和观察者间的可靠性更高。
部分骨水泥固定的假体盂周围的透亮线与组件就位程度无关。在平均43个月的随访中,假体盂组件完全就位对于实现影像学上的植入物稳定性并非必要。