Karukivi Max, Kortekangas-Savolainen Outi, Saxén Ulla, Haapasalo-Pesu Kirsi-Maria
Satakunta Hospital District, Psychiatric Care Division, Harjavalta, Finland; ; Department of Psychiatry, Turku University, Turku, Finland;
Medical Education Research and Development Centre, Turku University, Turku, Finland;
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2015 Oct;3(4):154-8.
Teaching medical professionalism is increasingly acknowledged as an important aspect of medical education. The Professionalism Mini-Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) is an assessment tool for evaluating medical professionalism, but no studies using it as a self-assessment instrument have been reported. This paper reports on a preliminary investigation of the Finnish version of the P-MEX instrument as an assessment and self-assessment measure.
The sample in the present cross-sectional study comprised all 23 medical students and recent graduates (15 females and 8 males) participating in a summer school of psychiatry program in 2014. The two-month program combines clinical work with multifaceted teaching and intensive tutoring. At the end of the program, the participants' medical professionalism was assessed by the tutors and other members of the work community as well as the students themselves using the Finnish version of the P-MEX instrument. The P-MEX scores were compared, using the Friedman test.
The mean values and SD for the P-MEX assessments were as follows: tutor assessment 3.26±0.21, work community assessment 3.32±0.26 and self-assessment 3.01±0.07. No significant gender differences were observed. The tutor and work community assessments were significantly correlated (r=0.573, p=0.040), but the self-assessment scores did not correlate with either of the other assessments. Overall, the students evaluated their skills significantly poorer in comparison to the other assessments.
Although the small sample size limits the generalization of these preliminary results, the Finnish version of the P-MEX instrument appears to be a feasible measure of medical professionalism. The instrument can also be used as a self-assessment instrument, but subjective evaluations should be complemented with external assessments or feedback in order to take individual and cultural aspects into account.
医学职业素养的教学日益被视为医学教育的一个重要方面。职业素养微型评估练习(P-MEX)是一种用于评估医学职业素养的工具,但尚无研究报告将其用作自我评估工具。本文报告了对芬兰语版P-MEX工具作为评估和自我评估手段的初步调查。
本横断面研究的样本包括2014年参加精神病学暑期学校项目的所有23名医学生和应届毕业生(15名女性和8名男性)。为期两个月的项目将临床工作与多方面教学和强化辅导相结合。在项目结束时,使用芬兰语版的P-MEX工具,由导师、工作团队的其他成员以及学生自己对参与者的医学职业素养进行评估。使用弗里德曼检验比较P-MEX得分。
P-MEX评估的平均值和标准差如下:导师评估3.26±0.21,工作团队评估3.32±0.26,自我评估3.01±0.07。未观察到显著的性别差异。导师和工作团队的评估显著相关(r = 0.573,p = 0.040),但自我评估得分与其他任何一项评估均无相关性。总体而言,与其他评估相比,学生对自己技能的评价明显较低。
尽管样本量较小限制了这些初步结果的推广,但芬兰语版的P-MEX工具似乎是一种可行的医学职业素养测量方法。该工具也可作为自我评估工具使用,但为了考虑个体和文化因素,主观评估应辅以外部评估或反馈。