• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学职业精神评估:在巴基斯坦背景下运用德尔菲技术开发专业精神评估工具(PAT)并进行心理测量分析。

Assessment of Medical Professionalism: Development and psychometric analysis of Professionalism Assessment Tool (PAT) in Pakistani context using Delphi Techniques.

作者信息

Noreen Khola, Zuberi Rukhsana W, Aftab Kausar, Fatima Sabahat

机构信息

Dr. Khola Noreen, Associate Professor, Community Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

Prof. Dr. Rukhsana W Zuberi, Professor Emerita, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Mar-Apr;39(2):330-337. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.2.6608.

DOI:10.12669/pjms.39.2.6608
PMID:36950436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10025719/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to develop and assess the content validity along with the reliability of a Professionalism Assessment Tool (PAT) with an intention to measure professionalism among undergraduate medical students.

METHODS

This psychometric analytical study validation study was carried out at Rawalpindi Medical University from 1 February to 1 June, 2021 after establishing feasibility and obtaining ethical approval. The non-probability convince sampling was employed to collect data. Using Nunnally's, the ratio of e subjects per item was selected, as our preliminary tool has 48 items so 384 sample size was estimated for scale validation. The preliminary 48-item tool with five subscales(cSS) developed through mutual consensus by the Delphi technique namely Communication skill(cSS1),-7 item, Accountability(cSS2)-8 item, Altruism(cSS3)-13 item, Self-Directed Learning (cSS4)-10 item and Ethics(cSS5),-10 item was labelled as Professionalism Assessment Tool (PAT). The tool was administered to 4 year MBBS students, the data obtained was analyzed by calculating Cronbach's alpha to estimate the reliability. The SPSS version 26 was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

The 48-item PAT had an overall reliability (Cronbach's alpha) of 0.783. The Reliability of the new Subscales were communication skills (0.405), self-directed learning (0.527), Accountability (0.378), Altruism (0.486) and Ethics (0.715).

CONCLUSION

The final tool developed for assessment of professionalism had 48 items on a seven point Likert like scale, across five Subscales. Results showed that it was determined as a useful tool in assessing professionalism in undergraduate medical students to generate reliable results for valid decision-making.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发并评估专业素养评估工具(PAT)的内容效度和信度,以测量本科医学生的专业素养。

方法

本心理测量分析验证研究于2021年2月1日至6月1日在拉瓦尔品第医科大学进行,此前已确定可行性并获得伦理批准。采用非概率便利抽样收集数据。根据努纳利的方法,选择每个项目的受试者比例,由于我们的初步工具包含48个项目,因此估计量表验证的样本量为384。通过德尔菲技术经共同协商开发的包含五个子量表(cSS)的初步48项工具,即沟通技巧(cSS1)-7项、问责制(cSS2)-8项、利他主义(cSS3)-13项、自主学习(cSS4)-10项和伦理(cSS5)-10项,被标记为专业素养评估工具(PAT)。该工具应用于四年制医学学士学生,通过计算克朗巴哈系数分析所获数据以估计信度。使用SPSS 26版进行数据分析。

结果

48项PAT的总体信度(克朗巴哈系数)为0.783。新子量表的信度分别为沟通技巧(0.405)、自主学习(0.527)、问责制(0.378)、利他主义(0.486)和伦理(0.715)。

结论

为评估专业素养而开发的最终工具在七点李克特量表上有48个项目,涵盖五个子量表。结果表明,它被确定为评估本科医学生专业素养的有用工具,可为有效决策产生可靠结果。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Medical Professionalism: Development and psychometric analysis of Professionalism Assessment Tool (PAT) in Pakistani context using Delphi Techniques.医学职业精神评估:在巴基斯坦背景下运用德尔菲技术开发专业精神评估工具(PAT)并进行心理测量分析。
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Mar-Apr;39(2):330-337. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.2.6608.
2
Validation Of An Assessment Tool For Professionalism In Medical Students: A Mixed Method Study.医学生职业素养评估工具的验证:混合方法研究。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2023 Nov;73(11):2177-2182. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.7770.
3
Assessing professional behaviors: a self-administered scale for medical students during clerkships.评估专业行为:医学生实习期间的自评量表。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jun 26;24(1):692. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05676-9.
4
Development and Validation of a Simplified Chinese Version of the Assessment Tool for Students' Perceptions of Medical Professionalism.《医学生医学职业精神感知评估工具简体中文版的编制与验证》
Curr Med Sci. 2019 Aug;39(4):670-678. doi: 10.1007/s11596-019-2090-7. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
5
Development and validation of a professionalism assessment scale for medical students.医学生职业素养评估量表的开发与验证
Int J Med Educ. 2014 Nov 9;5:205-11. doi: 10.5116/ijme.544b.7972.
6
Development and validation of self-assessment instrument to measure the digital professionalism of healthcare professionals using social media.开发和验证用于衡量医疗保健专业人员使用社交媒体的数字专业能力的自我评估工具。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 6;24(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05142-6.
7
Chinese version of the clinical supervision self-assessment tool: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床督导自我评估工具中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104734. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104734. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
8
Development and validation of a new self-assessment tool to measure professionalism among medical students.开发和验证一种新的医学生职业素养自评工具。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2023 Sep 27;52(9):457-466. doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022457.
9
Measuring professionalism in residency training programs in Iran.伊朗住院医师培训计划中的专业精神评估。
Med Teach. 2009 Aug;31(8):e356-61. doi: 10.1080/01421590802638022.
10
The Chinese version of Instrument of Professional Attitude for Student Nurses (IPASN): Assessment of reliability and validity.《护生专业态度量表》中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Feb;49:79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.013. Epub 2016 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of Digi-MEE Instrument measuring online learning environments in medical education.用于测量医学教育在线学习环境的Digi-MEE工具的开发与验证
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Nov-Dec;39(6):1573-1583. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.6.8430.

本文引用的文献

1
Scoping Review of frequently highlighted attributes of Medical Professionalism in an Undergraduate Medical Education Context.本科医学教育背景下医学职业精神常见突出属性的范围综述
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Jul-Aug;37(4):1221-1229. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.4.4004.
2
Practical Guidelines to Develop and Evaluate a Questionnaire.制定和评估调查问卷的实用指南。
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2021 Mar 2;12(2):266-275. doi: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_674_20. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.
3
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Instrument of Professional Attitude for Student Nurses (IPASN).《护生职业态度量表(IPASN)波斯语版的心理测量学特性》。
Nurs Open. 2021 Mar;8(2):784-791. doi: 10.1002/nop2.682. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
4
Exploration of constructs of professionalism identified in the ABIM framework as perceived by the faculty fitting the Pakistani context.探索符合巴基斯坦国情的教师所认为的美国内科医学委员会(ABIM)框架中确定的职业素养构成要素。
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Mar-Apr;36(3):473-478. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.3.1573.
5
A Systematic Review of the Quality and Utility of Observer-Based Instruments for Assessing Medical Professionalism.基于观察者的医学职业精神评估工具的质量与效用的系统评价
J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Dec;10(6):629-638. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00086.1.
6
Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine.围手术期与疼痛医学领域问卷的开发、翻译及验证指南。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 May;11(Suppl 1):S80-S89. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17.
7
Professionalism Mini-Evaluation Exercise in Finland: A preliminary investigation introducing the Finnish version of the P-MEX instrument.芬兰的职业素养小型评估练习:引入芬兰语版P-MEX工具的初步调查
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2015 Oct;3(4):154-8.
8
A Delphi study of medical professionalism in Arabian countries: the Four-Gates model.阿拉伯国家医学职业精神德尔菲研究:四门模型。
Med Teach. 2014 Apr;36 Suppl 1:S8-16. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.886013.
9
Medical professionalism: development and validation of the Arabian LAMPS.医学专业精神:阿拉伯 LAMPS 的发展与验证。
Med Teach. 2013;35 Suppl 1:S56-62. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.765553.
10
Measuring professionalism in residency training programs in Iran.伊朗住院医师培训计划中的专业精神评估。
Med Teach. 2009 Aug;31(8):e356-61. doi: 10.1080/01421590802638022.