Tainter Christopher R, Levine Alexander R, Quraishi Sadeq A, Butterly Arielle D, Stahl David L, Eikermann Matthias, Kaafarani Haytham M, Lee Jarone
1Division of Critical Care, Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA.2Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.3Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.4Department of Anesthesiology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.5Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.6Department of Surgery and Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):147-52. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001378.
The equipment, monitor alarms, and acuity of patients in ICUs make it one of the loudest patient care areas in a hospital. Increased sound levels may contribute to worsened outcomes in these particularly vulnerable patients. Our objective was to determine whether ambient sound levels in surgical ICUs comply with recommendations established by the World Health Organization and Environmental Protection Agency, and whether implementation of an overnight "quiet time" intervention is associated with lower ambient sound levels.
Prospective, observational cohort study.
Two comparable 18-bed, surgical ICUs in a large, teaching hospital. Only one ICU had a formal overnight quiet time policy at the start of the study period.
Sound levels were measured in 30-second blocks at preselected locations during the day and night over a period of 6 weeks using a simple, hand-held sound meter. All sound measurements in both units at all times exceeded recommended standards. Median minimum sound levels were lower at night in both units (50.8 and 50.3 vs 53.1 and 51.0 dB, p = 0.0003 and p = 0.009) and were similar between the two units (p = 0.52). The maximum overnight sound levels were statistically lower in the unit with the quiet time intervention implemented (62.5 vs 59.6 dB; p = 0.0040) and decreased overnight immediately after implementation of quiet time in the other unit (62.5 vs 56.1 dB; p < 0.0001). Maximum sound levels were lower inside patient rooms (52.2 vs 55.3 dB; p = 0.004), but minimum sound levels were similar (49.1 vs 49.2 dB; p = 0.23). Linear regression analysis showed that ICU census did not significantly influence sound levels.
Ambient sound levels in the surgical ICUs were consistently above levels recommended by the World Health Organization and Environmental Protection Agency at all times. The use of a formal quiet time intervention was associated with a significant, but clinically irrelevant reduction in the median maximum sound level at night. Our results suggest that excessive ambient noise in the ICU is largely attributable to environmental factors, and behavior modifications are unlikely to have a meaningful impact. Future investigations, as well as hospital designs, should target interventions toward ubiquitous noise sources such as ventilation systems, which may not traditionally be associated with patient care.
重症监护病房(ICU)中的设备、监护仪警报以及患者的病情严重程度使其成为医院中最嘈杂的患者护理区域之一。声音水平的增加可能会导致这些特别脆弱的患者预后恶化。我们的目的是确定外科重症监护病房的环境声音水平是否符合世界卫生组织和环境保护局制定的建议,以及实施夜间“安静时间”干预措施是否与较低的环境声音水平相关。
前瞻性观察队列研究。
一家大型教学医院的两个规模相当、各有18张床位的外科重症监护病房。在研究期开始时,只有一个重症监护病房有正式的夜间安静时间政策。
在6周的时间里,使用一个简单的手持式声级计,在白天和晚上的预选地点以30秒为间隔测量声音水平。两个病房在所有时间的所有声音测量值均超过了推荐标准。两个病房夜间的最低声音水平中位数均较低(分别为50.8和50.3,而白天为53.1和51.0分贝,p = 0.0003和p = 0.009),且两个病房之间相似(p = 0.52)。实施了安静时间干预措施的病房夜间的最高声音水平在统计学上较低(62.5对59.6分贝;p = 0.0040),而另一个病房在实施安静时间后夜间立即下降(62.5对56.1分贝;p < 0.0001)。病房内的最高声音水平较低(52.2对55.3分贝;p = 0.004),但最低声音水平相似(49.1对49.2分贝;p = 0.23)。线性回归分析表明,重症监护病房的患者人数对声音水平没有显著影响。
外科重症监护病房的环境声音水平始终高于世界卫生组织和环境保护局推荐的水平。使用正式的安静时间干预措施与夜间最高声音水平中位数显著但临床上无显著意义的降低相关。我们的结果表明,重症监护病房中过多的环境噪音在很大程度上归因于环境因素,行为改变不太可能产生有意义的影响。未来的研究以及医院设计应针对通风系统等普遍存在的噪音源进行干预,而通风系统传统上可能与患者护理无关。