Vreman Jeanette, Lemson Joris, Lanting Cris, van der Hoeven Johannes, van den Boogaard Mark
Department of Intensive Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Crit Care Explor. 2023 Mar 27;5(4):e0885. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000885. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Excessive noise is ubiquitous in the ICU, and there is growing evidence of the negative impact on work performance of caregivers. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of interventions to reduce noise in the ICU.
Databases of PubMed, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to September 14, 2022.
Two independent reviewers assessed titles and abstracts against study eligibility criteria. Noise mitigating ICU studies were included when having at least one quantitative acoustic outcome measure expressed in A-weighted sound pressure level with an experimental, quasi-experimental, or observational design. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus, and a third independent reviewer adjudicated as necessary.
After title, abstract, and full-text selection, two reviewers independently assessed the quality of each study using the Cochrane's Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool. Data were synthesized according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, and interventions were summarized.
After screening 12,652 articles, 25 articles were included, comprising either a mixed group of healthcare professionals ( = 17) or only nurses ( = 8) from adult or PICU settings. Overall, the methodological quality of the studies was low. Noise reduction interventions were categorized into education ( = 4), warning devices ( = 3), multicomponent programs ( = 15), and architectural redesign ( = 3). Education, a noise warning device, and an architectural redesign significantly decreased the sound pressure levels.
Staff education and visual alert systems seem promising interventions to reduce noise with a short-term effect. The evidence of the studied multicomponent intervention studies, which may lead to the best results, is still low. Therefore, high-quality studies with a low risk of bias and a long-term follow-up are warranted. Embedding noise shielding within the ICU-redesign is supportive to reduce sound pressure levels.
重症监护病房(ICU)中普遍存在过度噪音,且越来越多的证据表明其对医护人员的工作表现有负面影响。本研究旨在确定降低ICU噪音干预措施的有效性。
对PubMed、EMBASE、PsychINFO、CINAHL和Web of Science数据库从创建至2022年9月14日进行系统检索。
两名独立评审员根据研究纳入标准评估标题和摘要。当重症监护病房噪音缓解研究至少有一项以A加权声压级表示的定量声学结果测量,且采用实验性、准实验性或观察性设计时,予以纳入。分歧通过协商解决,必要时由第三位独立评审员裁决。
在标题、摘要和全文筛选后,两名评审员使用Cochrane非随机干预研究偏倚风险工具独立评估每项研究的质量。根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南对数据进行综合,并对干预措施进行总结。
在筛选12652篇文章后,纳入25篇文章,包括来自成人或儿科重症监护病房环境的医护人员混合组(n = 17)或仅护士组(n = 8)。总体而言,这些研究的方法学质量较低。降噪干预措施分为教育(n = 4)、警示装置(n = 3)、多组分方案(n = 15)和建筑重新设计(n = 3)。教育、噪音警示装置和建筑重新设计显著降低了声压水平。
员工教育和视觉警报系统似乎是有前景的短期降低噪音干预措施。可能产生最佳效果的多组分干预研究的证据仍然不足。因此,需要开展低偏倚风险和长期随访的高质量研究。在ICU重新设计中融入隔音措施有助于降低声压水平。