Yatham L N, Beaulieu S, Schaffer A, Kauer-Sant'Anna M, Kapczinski F, Lafer B, Sharma V, Parikh S V, Daigneault A, Qian H, Bond D J, Silverstone P H, Walji N, Milev R, Baruch P, da Cunha A, Quevedo J, Dias R, Kunz M, Young L T, Lam R W, Wong H
Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Douglas Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Mol Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;21(8):1050-6. doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.158. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
Atypical antipsychotic adjunctive therapy to lithium or valproate is effective in treating acute mania. Although continuation of atypical antipsychotic adjunctive therapy after mania remission reduces relapse of mood episodes, the optimal duration is unknown. As many atypical antipsychotics cause weight gain and metabolic syndrome, they should not be continued unless the benefits outweigh the risks. This 52-week double-blind placebo-controlled trial recruited patients with bipolar I disorder (n=159) who recently remitted from a manic episode during treatment with risperidone or olanzapine adjunctive therapy to lithium or valproate. Patients were randomized to one of three conditions: discontinuation of risperidone or olanzapine and substitution with placebo at (i) entry ('0-weeks' group) or (ii) at 24 weeks after entry ('24-weeks' group) or (iii) continuation of risperidone or olanzapine for the full duration of the study ('52-weeks' group). The primary outcome measure was time to relapse of any mood episode. Compared with the 0-weeks group, the time to any mood episode was significantly longer in the 24-weeks group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33, 0.86) and nearly so in the 52-weeks group (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.39, 1.02). The relapse rate was similar in the 52-weeks group compared with the 24-weeks group (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.71, 1.99); however, sub-group analysis showed discordant results between the two antipsychotics (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.17; 1.32 olanzapine patients; HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.00, 3.41 risperidone patients). Average weight gain was 3.2 kg in the 52-weeks group compared with a weight loss of 0.2 kg in the 0-weeks and 0.1 kg in the 24-weeks groups. These findings suggest that risperidone or olanzapine adjunctive therapy for 24 weeks is beneficial but continuation of risperidone beyond this period does not reduce the risk of relapse. Whether continuation of olanzapine beyond this period reduces relapse risk remains unclear but the potential benefit needs to be weighed against an increased risk of weight gain.
非典型抗精神病药物辅助锂盐或丙戊酸盐治疗对急性躁狂有效。虽然躁狂缓解后继续使用非典型抗精神病药物辅助治疗可降低心境发作的复发率,但最佳疗程尚不清楚。由于许多非典型抗精神病药物会导致体重增加和代谢综合征,除非益处大于风险,否则不应继续使用。这项为期52周的双盲安慰剂对照试验招募了159例I型双相情感障碍患者,这些患者在使用利培酮或奥氮平辅助锂盐或丙戊酸盐治疗期间近期从躁狂发作中缓解。患者被随机分为三种情况之一:在(i)入组时(“0周”组)或(ii)入组后24周(“24周”组)停用利培酮或奥氮平并用安慰剂替代,或(iii)在研究全程继续使用利培酮或奥氮平(“52周”组)。主要结局指标是任何心境发作的复发时间。与“0周”组相比,“24周”组任何心境发作的时间显著延长(风险比(HR)0.53;95%置信区间(CI):0.33,0.86),“52周”组也接近这一结果(HR:0.63;95%CI:0.39,1.02)。“52周”组与“24周”组的复发率相似(HR:1.18;95%CI:0.71,1.99);然而,亚组分析显示两种抗精神病药物之间结果不一致(奥氮平患者HR:0.48,95%CI:0.17,1.32;利培酮患者HR:1.85,95%CI:1.00,3.41)。“52周”组平均体重增加3.2千克,而“0周”组体重减轻0.2千克,“24周”组体重减轻0.1千克。这些发现表明,利培酮或奥氮平辅助治疗24周有益,但在此之后继续使用利培酮并不能降低复发风险。在此之后继续使用奥氮平是否能降低复发风险仍不清楚,但潜在益处需要与体重增加风险的增加相权衡。