Kwate Naa Oyo A, Goodman Melody S
Department of Human Ecology.
Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2015 Sep;85(5):397-408. doi: 10.1037/ort0000086.
Several studies investigating the health effects of racism have reported gender and socioeconomic differences in exposures to racism, with women typically reporting lower frequencies, and individuals with greater resources reporting higher frequencies. This study used diverse measures of socioeconomic position and multiple measures and methods to assess experienced racism. Socioeconomic position included education and financial and employment status. Quantitative racism measures assessed individual experiences with day-to-day and with major lifetime incidents and perceptions of the extent to which African Americans as a group experience racism. A brief qualitative question asked respondents to describe a racist incident that stood out in recent memory. Participants comprised a probability sample of N = 144 African American adults aged 19 to 87 residing in New York City. Results suggested that women reported fewer lifetime incidents but did not differ from men on everyday racism. These differences appear to be partly because of scale content. Socioeconomic position as measured by years of education was positively associated with reported racism in the total sample but differently patterned across gender; subjective social status showed a negative association. Qualitative responses describing memorable incidents fell into 5 key categories: resources/opportunity structures, criminal profiling, racial aggression/assault, interpersonal incivilities, and stereotyping. In these narratives, men were more likely to offer accounts involving criminal profiling, and women encountered incivilities more often. The findings highlight the need for closer attention to the intersection of gender and socioeconomic factors in investigations of the health effects of racism.
几项关于种族主义对健康影响的研究报告了在遭受种族主义方面存在的性别和社会经济差异,女性通常报告的频率较低,而资源较多的人报告的频率较高。本研究采用了多种社会经济地位衡量指标以及多种测量方法来评估所经历的种族主义。社会经济地位包括教育程度、财务状况和就业状况。量化的种族主义测量指标评估了个人在日常和重大人生事件中的经历,以及对非裔美国人作为一个群体遭受种族主义程度的看法。一个简短的定性问题要求受访者描述一件近期记忆中突出的种族主义事件。参与者是居住在纽约市的144名年龄在19岁至87岁之间的非裔美国成年人的概率样本。结果表明,女性报告的一生事件较少,但在日常种族主义方面与男性没有差异。这些差异似乎部分是由于量表内容。以受教育年限衡量的社会经济地位在总样本中与报告的种族主义呈正相关,但在性别上的模式不同;主观社会地位呈负相关。描述难忘事件的定性回答分为5个关键类别:资源/机会结构、刑事 profiling、种族攻击/袭击、人际不文明行为和刻板印象。在这些叙述中,男性更有可能讲述涉及刑事 profiling的事件,而女性更常遇到不文明行为。研究结果凸显了在调查种族主义对健康的影响时,需要更加密切关注性别和社会经济因素的交叉情况。