Suppr超能文献

成年助听器使用者的耳蜗死区局限于高频:对放大的影响。

Adult hearing-aid users with cochlear dead regions restricted to high frequencies: Implications for amplification.

作者信息

Pepler Anna, Lewis Kathryn, Munro Kevin J

机构信息

a School of Psychological Sciences , University of Manchester , UK and.

b Audiology Department , University Hospitals South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust , Manchester , UK.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2016;55(1):20-9. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1074294. Epub 2015 Oct 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Cochlear dead regions (DR) are common in adult hearing-aid users, but are usually restricted to high frequencies. The aim was to determine the benefit of high-frequency amplification for ears with and without high-frequency DRs.

DESIGN

Participants were fitted with the study hearing aid and tested under four conditions: unfiltered (NAL-NL2 prescription), and low-pass filtered at 1.5, 2, and 3 kHz. VCV stimuli were presented at 65 dB (A) in quiet and in 20-talker babble at a signal-to-babble ratio of 0 dB.

STUDY SAMPLE

Experienced adult hearing-aid users: one group of 18 with a DR edge frequency above 1.5 kHz, and a group of 18 matched controls.

RESULTS

Overall performance was best in the unfiltered condition. There was no significant difference in mean performance between the two groups when tested in quiet. However, the DR group obtained less benefit from high-frequency amplification when tested in babble: the mean difference between the unfiltered and 3-kHz filtered condition was 6% and 13% for the DR group and controls, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with a moderate hearing loss and a restricted DR, speech recognition was always best in the unfiltered condition, although mean performance in babble was lower for the DR group.

摘要

目的

耳蜗死区(DR)在成年助听器使用者中很常见,但通常局限于高频。本研究旨在确定高频放大对存在和不存在高频DR的耳朵的益处。

设计

为参与者佩戴研究用助听器,并在四种条件下进行测试:未滤波(NAL-NL2处方),以及在1.5、2和3千赫处进行低通滤波。在安静环境中以65分贝(A)呈现VCV刺激,并在20人嘈杂环境中以0分贝的信号-嘈杂比呈现。

研究样本

有经验的成年助听器使用者:一组18人,其DR边缘频率高于1.5千赫,另一组18人作为匹配对照。

结果

总体表现以未滤波条件下最佳。在安静环境中测试时,两组的平均表现无显著差异。然而,在嘈杂环境中测试时,DR组从高频放大中获得的益处较少:DR组和对照组在未滤波和3千赫滤波条件下的平均差异分别为6%和13%。

结论

在患有中度听力损失且存在局限DR的成年人中,尽管DR组在嘈杂环境中的平均表现较低,但言语识别始终以未滤波条件下最佳。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验