Chen Qingshan, Wang Hua-jun, Gay Ralph E, Thompson Jeffrey M, Manduca Armando, An Kai-Nan, Ehman Richard E, Basford Jeffrey R
Biomechanics Laboratory, Division of Orthopedic Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jan;97(1):67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.09.019. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
To assess the correlation of clinician-identified myofascial taut bands with their presence and characteristics on magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) imaging.
Cross-sectional study.
A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) research laboratory.
A convenience sample of adults (N=65; 45 women, 20 men) identified by skilled musculoskeletal physicians as having upper trapezius myofascial pain-associated taut bands.
Subjects had their taut bands outlined and were positioned within a 1.5T MRI machine. Shear waves were induced with a pneumatic transducer located over the belly of the involved muscle. Wave propagation was visualized with MRE images across a vibration cycle. Imaging data were assessed independently by 2 skilled MRE interpreters.
The primary outcome measure was the determination of the intra- and interrater reliabilities of MRE taut band identification and their correlation with clinician identification of band presence. Secondary outcomes consisted of the elucidation of the physical characteristics of taut bands and their surrounding muscle tissue.
MRE intra- and interrater reliability was excellent, with kappa coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of .86 (.68-1.00) and .93 (.79-1.00), respectively. Stiffness in MRE-identified taut bands was elevated at a mean ± SD of 11.5±2.4 kPa and fell to 5.8±0.9 kPa in surrounding muscle tissue (P<.001); muscular tone in trapezius muscles without a taut band was relatively uniform at 6.6±2.1 kPa. Agreement between the physicians and the MRE raters, however, was relatively poor (63.1%; 95% CI, 50.2%-74.7%).
Our findings suggest that while clinicians may overestimate, and current MRE techniques may underestimate, the presence of taut bands, these bands do exist, can be assessed quantitatively, and do represent localized areas of increased muscle stiffness.
评估临床医生识别的肌筋膜紧张带与其在磁共振弹性成像(MRE)图像上的存在及特征之间的相关性。
横断面研究。
一个磁共振成像(MRI)研究实验室。
由熟练的肌肉骨骼科医生确定为患有上斜方肌肌筋膜疼痛相关紧张带的成年人便利样本(N = 65;45名女性,20名男性)。
受试者的紧张带被勾勒出来,并被安置在1.5T MRI机器内。用位于受累肌肉肌腹上方的气动换能器诱发剪切波。通过MRE图像在一个振动周期内观察波的传播。成像数据由2名熟练的MRE解释者独立评估。
主要观察指标是确定MRE紧张带识别的评分者内和评分者间信度及其与临床医生对紧张带存在的识别之间的相关性。次要结果包括阐明紧张带及其周围肌肉组织的物理特征。
MRE评分者内和评分者间信度极佳,kappa系数和95%置信区间(CI)分别为0.86(0.68 - 1.00)和0.93(0.79 - 1.00)。MRE识别的紧张带中的硬度升高,平均±标准差为11.5±2.4 kPa,而周围肌肉组织中的硬度降至5.8±0.9 kPa(P <.001);没有紧张带的斜方肌中的肌张力相对均匀,为6.6±2.1 kPa。然而,医生和MRE评分者之间的一致性相对较差(63.1%;95% CI,50.2% - 74.7%)。
我们的研究结果表明,虽然临床医生可能高估了紧张带的存在,而当前的MRE技术可能低估了其存在,但这些紧张带确实存在,可以进行定量评估,并且确实代表了肌肉硬度增加的局部区域。