• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实时剪切波弹性成像在斜方肌筋膜疼痛综合征中的粘弹性研究:定量评估。

Viscoelasticity in trapezius myofascial pain syndrome: quantitative assessment using Real-Time Shear-Wave Elastography.

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanxi Tongji Hospital, Taiyuan, China.

Department of Ultrasound, Sixth Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.

出版信息

Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2252442. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2252442.

DOI:10.1080/07853890.2023.2252442
PMID:37676997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10486288/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the differences in the viscoelastic properties between normal trapezius muscles and those in patients with trapezius myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) using real-time shear-wave elastography (SWE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 31 patients with trapezius MPS and 31 volunteers. Sixty-one trapezius muscles (41 and 20 on the affected and non-affected side, respectively) of patients with MPS and 62 normal trapezius muscles in volunteers were assessed. Conventional ultrasonic parameters, including skeletal muscle thickness, resistance index (RI), and mean shear wave velocity (SWV) of trapezius muscles, were obtained in the seated position with the shoulders and neck relaxed. The daily neck leaning time (unit:hours) of all participants was obtained using a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Ultrasound showed no statistically significant differences in thickness or RI of the trapezius muscles of the affected and non-affected sides in MPS patients versus normal trapezius muscles ( = 0.976 and 0.106, respectively). In contrast, the SWV of trapezius muscles in patients with MPS was significantly higher than that of normal trapezius muscles in both the affected and non-affected sides (4.41 ± 1.02 m/s vs. 3.35 ± 0.79 m/s,  < 0.001; 4.05 ± 0.63 m/s vs. 3.35 ± 0.79 m/s,  = 0.002). There was no significant difference between the SWV of the trapezius muscles on the affected and non-affected sides in patients with MPS (4.41 ± 1.02 m/s vs. 4.05 ± 0.63 m/s,  = 0.225). Correlation analysis showed that daily neck forward time was positively correlated with the SWV of the trapezius muscles on the affected and non-affected sides in patients with MPS ( = 0.635,  < 0.001;  = 0.576,  = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

SWE can quantitatively evaluate stiffness of trapezius muscles in patients with trapezius MPS. The stiffness of both affected and non-affected trapezius muscles increased in patients with trapezius MPS, and the degree of increase positively correlated with the time of cervical forward leaning.

摘要

目的

应用实时剪切波弹性成像(SWE)技术研究正常斜方肌与斜方肌肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)患者斜方肌之间的黏弹性差异。

材料与方法

本研究纳入 31 例斜方肌 MPS 患者和 31 名志愿者。对 MPS 患者 61 块斜方肌(患侧 41 块,健侧 20 块)和志愿者 62 块正常斜方肌进行评估。采用坐姿,双肩和颈部放松,获得常规超声参数,包括斜方肌厚度、阻力指数(RI)和平均剪切波速度(SWV)。使用问卷调查获取所有参与者的每日颈部前倾时间(单位:小时)。

结果

超声显示,MPS 患者患侧和健侧斜方肌厚度和 RI 与正常斜方肌比较,差异均无统计学意义( = 0.976 和 0.106)。相反,MPS 患者斜方肌 SWV 明显高于患侧和健侧正常斜方肌(4.41 ± 1.02 m/s 比 3.35 ± 0.79 m/s,  < 0.001;4.05 ± 0.63 m/s 比 3.35 ± 0.79 m/s,  = 0.002)。MPS 患者患侧和健侧斜方肌 SWV 差异无统计学意义(4.41 ± 1.02 m/s 比 4.05 ± 0.63 m/s,  = 0.225)。相关性分析显示,MPS 患者患侧和健侧斜方肌每日颈部前倾时间与 SWV 呈正相关( = 0.635,  < 0.001;  = 0.576,  = 0.008)。

结论

SWE 可定量评估斜方肌 MPS 患者斜方肌的僵硬程度。斜方肌 MPS 患者患侧和健侧斜方肌僵硬度均增加,且增加程度与颈椎前屈时间呈正相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5c/10486288/48fb71030067/IANN_A_2252442_F0006_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5c/10486288/997f39e26578/IANN_A_2252442_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5c/10486288/e036a980d104/IANN_A_2252442_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5c/10486288/c6aba74c247e/IANN_A_2252442_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5c/10486288/fd2c82540c72/IANN_A_2252442_F0004_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5c/10486288/f82800511a51/IANN_A_2252442_F0005_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5c/10486288/48fb71030067/IANN_A_2252442_F0006_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5c/10486288/997f39e26578/IANN_A_2252442_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5c/10486288/e036a980d104/IANN_A_2252442_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5c/10486288/c6aba74c247e/IANN_A_2252442_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5c/10486288/fd2c82540c72/IANN_A_2252442_F0004_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5c/10486288/f82800511a51/IANN_A_2252442_F0005_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e5c/10486288/48fb71030067/IANN_A_2252442_F0006_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Viscoelasticity in trapezius myofascial pain syndrome: quantitative assessment using Real-Time Shear-Wave Elastography.实时剪切波弹性成像在斜方肌筋膜疼痛综合征中的粘弹性研究:定量评估。
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2252442. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2252442.
2
Upper trapezius muscle elasticity in cervical myofascial pain syndrome measured using real-time ultrasound shear-wave elastography.使用实时超声剪切波弹性成像技术测量颈肌筋膜疼痛综合征中上斜方肌的弹性
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Aug 1;13(8):5168-5181. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-797. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
3
New application of multimodal ultrasound imaging for identification of myofascial trigger points in the trapezius muscle.多模态超声成像在斜方肌肌筋膜触发点识别中的新应用。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Sep;10(9):9784-9791. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-2103.
4
Quantitative ultrasound of trapezius muscle involvement in myofascial pain: comparison of clinical and healthy population using texture analysis.肌筋膜疼痛中斜方肌受累的定量超声检查:使用纹理分析对临床人群和健康人群的比较
J Ultrasound. 2020 Mar;23(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/s40477-018-0330-5. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
5
Changes in stiffness at active myofascial trigger points of the upper trapezius after dry needling in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.慢性颈痛患者接受干针治疗后斜方肌上束激痛点活动性僵硬的变化:一项随机对照试验。
Acupunct Med. 2023 Jun;41(3):121-129. doi: 10.1177/09645284221104831. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
6
The difference in the upper trapezius deep fascia slides between individuals with and without myofascial pain syndrome: A case-control study.有肌筋膜疼痛综合征和无肌筋膜疼痛综合征个体之间斜方肌深筋膜滑动的差异:一项病例对照研究。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024 Apr;38:375-383. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.12.011. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
7
Ultrasound imaging of the upper trapezius muscle for safer myofascial trigger point injections: a case report.超声对上斜方肌成像以实现更安全的肌筋膜触发点注射:病例报告。
Phys Sportsmed. 2019 Sep;47(3):247-248. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2019.1589105. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
8
Results of ultrasound-guided interfascial block of the trapezius muscle for myofascial pain.超声引导下斜方肌筋膜间阻滞治疗肌筋膜疼痛的效果。
Agri. 2022 Jul;34(3):187-192. doi: 10.14744/agri.2021.98048.
9
Quantitative ultrasound to assess efficacy of treatment for neck somatic dysfunctions: a feasibility study.定量超声评估颈部躯体功能障碍治疗效果的可行性研究。
J Osteopath Med. 2023 Jun 8;123(9):443-450. doi: 10.1515/jom-2022-0216. eCollection 2023 Sep 1.
10
Evaluation of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Treatment-Resistant Trigger Points Using Sonographic Shear Wave Elastography.使用超声剪切波弹性成像评估桡侧体外冲击波疗法对难治性触发点的治疗效果
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2023 Oct;33(10):1159-1164. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2023.10.1159.

引用本文的文献

1
Regional variations in plantar fascia elasticity and their association with pain in plantar fasciitis: a cross-sectional study.足底筋膜弹性的区域差异及其与足底筋膜炎疼痛的关联:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30568. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15760-9.
2
Ultrasound features of myofascial trigger points: a multimodal study integrating preliminary histological findings from the upper trapezius.肌筋膜触发点的超声特征:一项整合斜方肌上部初步组织学发现的多模态研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20510. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05869-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Is Shear-Wave Elastography a Clinical Severity Indicator of Myofascial Pain Syndrome? An Observational Study.剪切波弹性成像是否为肌筋膜疼痛综合征的临床严重程度指标?一项观察性研究。
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 29;10(13):2895. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132895.
2
Update to the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Liver Elastography Consensus Statement.超声弹性成像领域放射学会共识声明更新。
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):263-274. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192437. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
3
The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Elastography in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2018.
EFSUMB 弹性成像临床应用指南与推荐意见:非肝脏领域 2018 年更新版
Ultraschall Med. 2019 Aug;40(4):425-453. doi: 10.1055/a-0838-9937. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
4
Neck Muscle Stiffness in Participants With and Without Chronic Neck Pain: A Shear-Wave Elastography Study.有和没有慢性颈部疼痛的参与者的颈部肌肉僵硬:一项剪切波弹性成像研究
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 Sep;41(7):580-588. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.01.007.
5
Quantitative Ultrasound Assessment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome Affecting the Trapezius: A Reliability Study.影响斜方肌的肌筋膜疼痛综合征的定量超声评估:一项可靠性研究。
J Ultrasound Med. 2017 Dec;36(12):2559-2568. doi: 10.1002/jum.14308. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
6
Shear-Wave Elastography: Basic Physics and Musculoskeletal Applications.剪切波弹性成像:基本物理原理与肌肉骨骼系统应用
Radiographics. 2017 May-Jun;37(3):855-870. doi: 10.1148/rg.2017160116.
7
Pathophysiology of Trigger Points in Myofascial Pain Syndrome.肌筋膜疼痛综合征中触发点的病理生理学
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2017 Jun;31(2):158-159. doi: 10.1080/15360288.2017.1298688. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
8
Reliability of assessment of upper trapezius morphology, its mechanical properties and blood flow in female patients with myofascial pain syndrome using ultrasonography.超声检查评估女性肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者上斜方肌形态、力学性能及血流的可靠性
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017 Jan;21(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
9
Changes in stiffness of the dorsal scapular muscles before and after computer work: a comparison between individuals with and without neck and shoulder complaints.肩胛背部肌肉在电脑工作前后的僵硬度变化:有颈肩痛和无颈肩痛个体间的比较。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Jan;117(1):179-187. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3510-z. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
10
Ultrasound shear wave elastography in assessment of muscle stiffness in patients with Parkinson's disease: a primary observation.超声剪切波弹性成像评估帕金森病患者肌肉僵硬程度的初步观察
Clin Imaging. 2016 Nov-Dec;40(6):1075-1080. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 May 29.