Petrovich Z, Langholz B, Gibbs F A, Sapozink M D, Kapp D S, Stewart R J, Emami B, Oleson J, Senzer N, Slater J
University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989 Mar;16(3):601-7. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90475-6.
A Phase I study using deep regional hyperthermia (HT) with an annular phased array was conducted in 14 U.S. medical centers from 1980 through 1986. There were 353 patients whose average age was 57 years. All patients had advanced recurrent or persistent tumors. Prior frequently complex, multimodality anti-cancer therapy was received by 71% of the patients. Gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma was present in 146 (41%) patients, genitourinary tumors in 86 (24%), soft tissue sarcomas in 46 (13%), malignant melanoma in 21 (6%) and 15% had other tumors. The sites treated included: pelvis 55%, abdomen 21%, liver 14%, thorax 6%, and other sites 3%. All patients received deep regional HT with an average frequency of 55 MHz. A total of 1412 HT treatments was administered to these 353 patients with an aim to increase the temperature in the volume of interest to greater than 42 degrees C for greater than or equal to 30 minutes. Thermal dose (TD in equivalent minutes at 42.5 degrees C) was less than 50 in 104 (29%), greater than or equal to 50 less than 100 in 30 (11%), greater than or equal to 100 in 26 (7%), and greater than 200 in 34 (10%). The remaining 150 (42%) patients had TD = 0. In addition to HT, 260 (74%) received radiotherapy (RT). RT was given at 180 or 200 cGy daily with an average total dose of 33.4 Gy. A total of 42 (12%) patients were given chemotherapy (CT) with HT, and 15 (4%) CT + HT + RT/HT alone was given to 47 (13%) patients. Complete response (CR) was obtained in 35 (10%) and partial response (PR) in 59 (17%) patients. CR was 12% in patients who received RT, vs 2% in those who did not receive it, p = 0.003. Radiation dose was an important factor influencing response, p less than 0.001. Thermal dose was not an important parameter influencing tumor response. A duration of CR ranged from 4 to 73 weeks with an average duration of 31 weeks and the median duration of 28 weeks. The overall 2-year survival was 13% with the median survival of 42 weeks. Patients with CR and PR had a 2 year survival of 41%, and a median survival of 71 weeks. This compared with 8% 2-year survival and 24 weeks median survival in patients who did not have CR or PR, p less than 0.001. Of the patients presenting with significant pain, 62% had complete or partial pain relief.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
1980年至1986年期间,美国14家医疗中心开展了一项关于使用环形相控阵进行深部区域热疗(HT)的I期研究。共有353例患者,平均年龄57岁。所有患者均患有晚期复发或持续性肿瘤。71%的患者之前接受过频繁且复杂的多模式抗癌治疗。146例(41%)患者为胃肠道腺癌,86例(24%)为泌尿生殖系统肿瘤,46例(13%)为软组织肉瘤,21例(6%)为恶性黑色素瘤,15%为其他肿瘤。治疗部位包括:骨盆55%、腹部21%、肝脏14%、胸部6%以及其他部位3%。所有患者均接受深部区域热疗,平均频率为55兆赫。这353例患者共接受了1412次热疗,目的是将感兴趣区域的温度升高至42摄氏度以上并持续30分钟以上。热剂量(42.5摄氏度时的等效分钟数TD)在104例(29%)患者中小于50,30例(11%)患者大于或等于50且小于100,26例(7%)患者大于或等于100,34例(10%)患者大于200。其余150例(42%)患者的TD = 0。除热疗外,260例(74%)患者接受了放射治疗(RT)。放疗剂量为每日180或200厘戈瑞,平均总剂量为33.4戈瑞。共有42例(12%)患者在热疗时接受了化疗(CT),15例(4%)患者接受了CT + HT + RT/仅HT。35例(10%)患者获得完全缓解(CR),59例(17%)患者获得部分缓解(PR)。接受放疗的患者CR率为12%,未接受放疗的患者为2%,p = 0.003。放射剂量是影响缓解的重要因素,p < 0.001。热剂量不是影响肿瘤缓解的重要参数。CR持续时间为4至73周,平均持续时间为31周,中位持续时间为28周。总体2年生存率为13%,中位生存期为42周。CR和PR患者的2年生存率为41%,中位生存期为71周。相比之下,未达到CR或PR的患者2年生存率为8%,中位生存期为24周,p < 0.001。出现明显疼痛的患者中,62%的患者疼痛完全或部分缓解。(摘要截选至400字)