Suppr超能文献

使用间质热放疗(IHT-IRT)对预后参数进行多变量分析:肿瘤和治疗变量可预测结果。

Multivariate analysis of prognostic parameters using interstitial thermoradiotherapy (IHT-IRT): tumor and treatment variables predict outcome.

作者信息

Seegenschmiedt M H, Martus P, Fietkau R, Iro H, Brady L W, Sauer R

机构信息

Strahlentherapeutische Klinik, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Jul 30;29(5):1049-63. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90401-4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

From January 1986 to October 1991, 90 patients with localized tumors were treated in a Phase I/II trial using low-dose 192Ir brachytherapy (IRT) plus interstitial 915 MHz microwave (MW) hyperthermia (IHT) and external beam radiotherapy (ERT). Tumors were classified as locally advanced primary (class 1: 27), recurrent (class 2: 40), metastatic (class 3: 10) and persistent (class 4: 13) lesions. The treatment sites included tumors of the head and neck (62), pelvis (26), and others (2). The mean cuboidal tumor volume was 63 cm3 (range: 8-288 cm3). Most recurrent and metastatic lesions (48) had received prior treatment including ERT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The treatment protocol prescribed two heating sessions (each 60 min) at 41-44 degrees C before and after IRT. One hundred sixty-one IHT sessions were evaluated. Invasive thermal data were recorded at an average of 18 sites throughout the implant volume. Several thermal variables were analyzed (e.g., averaged parameters: Tmaxav, Tmean, Tminav; index parameters: T10, T50, T90). The study was evaluated with a minimum follow up (FU) of one year. Median follow-up was 19 months.

RESULTS

At 3 months FU, a complete response (CR) was observed in 59 of 90 (66%) patients. At 12 months FU, local control (LC) was achieved in 54 of 84 (64%) evaluable patients. Ten patients developed a local and 14 a regional recurrence (REC) after achieving a CR and/or LC. At last FU, a total of 31 (34%) patients were still alive and 28 (31%) patients had relapse-free survival. For all 90 patients, the median overall survival was 20 months and the median relapse-free survival was 17 months. Overall and relapse-free survival was significantly longer for primary and persistent lesions as compared to recurrent and metastatic lesions (p = 0.002; p < 0.001). Totally 22 (24%) patients experienced acute or subacute side-effects (Grade 1: 12 patients; Grade 2: eight patients; Grade 3: two patients).

CONCLUSION

Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed significant dependencies of CR, LC and REC upon tumor parameters as well as radiation and thermal parameters. The overall and relapse free survival was associated with tumor and radiation parameters. The multivariate analysis revealed two independent predictors of CR: tumor volume and minimum tumor temperature variables. We conclude, that IHT-IRT is a safe and effective treatment. The results provide important implications for planning HT-RT studies and for defining quality assurance (QA) criteria and thermal performance standards in HT studies.

摘要

目的

1986年1月至1991年10月,90例局限性肿瘤患者在一项I/II期试验中接受了低剂量192铱近距离放射治疗(IRT)联合组织间915兆赫微波(MW)热疗(IHT)及外照射放疗(ERT)。肿瘤分为局部晚期原发性(1类:27例)、复发性(2类:40例)、转移性(3类:10例)和持续性(4类:13例)病变。治疗部位包括头颈部肿瘤(62例)、盆腔肿瘤(26例)及其他部位肿瘤(2例)。肿瘤平均立方体积为63立方厘米(范围:8 - 288立方厘米)。大多数复发性和转移性病变(48例)曾接受过包括ERT在内的先前治疗。

方法与材料

治疗方案规定在IRT前后各进行两次41 - 44摄氏度、每次60分钟的加热疗程。共评估了161次IHT疗程。在整个植入体积内平均18个部位记录侵入性热数据。分析了多个热变量(如平均参数:Tmaxav、Tmean、Tminav;指数参数:T10、T50、T90)。该研究的最低随访期为1年。中位随访时间为19个月。

结果

在3个月随访时,90例患者中有59例(66%)观察到完全缓解(CR)。在12个月随访时,84例可评估患者中有54例(64%)实现局部控制(LC)。10例患者在达到CR和/或LC后出现局部复发,14例出现区域复发(REC)。在最后一次随访时,共有31例(34%)患者仍存活,28例(31%)患者无复发生存。对于所有90例患者,中位总生存期为20个月,中位无复发生存期为17个月。与复发性和转移性病变相比,原发性和持续性病变的总生存期和无复发生存期显著更长(p = 0.002;p < 0.001)。共有22例(24%)患者出现急性或亚急性副作用(1级:12例患者;2级:8例患者;3级:2例患者)。

结论

单因素逻辑回归分析显示CR、LC和REC与肿瘤参数以及放疗和热疗参数之间存在显著相关性。总生存期和无复发生存期与肿瘤和放疗参数相关。多因素分析显示CR的两个独立预测因素:肿瘤体积和最低肿瘤温度变量。我们得出结论,IHT - IRT是一种安全有效的治疗方法。这些结果为规划热疗 - 放疗研究以及为定义热疗研究中的质量保证(QA)标准和热性能标准提供了重要启示。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验