Opper Sonja, Nee Victor, Brehm Stefan
Lund University, Department of Economics, Scheelevägen 15B, 22007 Lund, Sweden.
Cornell University, Department of Sociology, 312/330 Uris Hall, 14853 Ithaca, NY, United States.
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Nov;54:332-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
We argue that leadership promotion in China's political elite relies on homophily for signals of trustworthiness and future cooperative behavior more than on economic performance. We first point to the limitation of the economic performance argument from within the framework of China's specific M-form state structure, and then we proffer a sociological explanation for why higher-level elites in China rely on homophilous associations in recruiting middle-level elites to the top positions of state. Using a unique dataset covering China's provincial leaders from 1979 to 2011, we develop a homophily index focusing on joint origin, joint education and joint work experience. We trace personal similarities in these respects between provincial leaders and members of China's supreme decision-making body, the Politbureau's Standing Committee. We then provide robust evidence confirming the persisting impact of homophilous associations on promotion patterns in post-reform China.
我们认为,中国政治精英的晋升更多地依赖于基于可信赖度信号和未来合作行为的同质性,而非经济绩效。我们首先在中国特定的M型国家结构框架内指出经济绩效论点的局限性,然后从社会学角度解释为何中国的高层精英在选拔中层精英担任国家高层职位时依赖同质性关联。利用一个涵盖1979年至2011年中国省级领导干部的独特数据集,我们构建了一个聚焦于共同出身、共同教育背景和共同工作经历的同质性指数。我们追踪省级领导干部与中国最高决策机构中央政治局常务委员会成员在这些方面的个人相似性。随后,我们提供了有力证据,证实了同质性关联对改革后中国晋升模式的持续影响。