Room PV412, The O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, 1315 E. 10th Street, Bloomington, IN, 47405-1701, USA.
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 15;264:110306. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110306. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
China's electricity industry has gone through three decades of market-oriented reform, and this process is often interpreted as a tug of war between marketization and state control. However, this paper argues that a dichotomous conception of the state-market relationship cannot explain the evolution and complexity of China's electricity governance. By systematically analyzing the institutions of China's electricity reform, this paper identifies a sequence of innovations that align well with both the history of China's economic transition and the institutional underpinnings of China's economic governance. Also, by interpreting the respective roles of state and market in China's reformed electricity industry, this paper shows that state control and marketization are complementary rather than contradictory, and that their complementarity is best exercised in addressing issues like market fragmentation and renewable energy curtailment. Moreover, this paper presents two case studies - both on China's most recent electricity market experimentation - to elaborate how state and market jointly serve sectoral functions as well as broader economic and political goals.
中国的电力行业经历了三十年的市场化改革,这一过程常常被解读为市场化和国家控制之间的拉锯战。然而,本文认为,国家-市场关系的二分法概念不能解释中国电力治理的演变和复杂性。本文通过系统分析中国电力改革的制度,确定了一系列与中国经济转型历史和经济治理制度基础相一致的创新。此外,通过解释国家和市场在中国改革后的电力行业中的各自作用,本文表明国家控制和市场化是互补的,而不是相互矛盾的,它们的互补性在解决市场碎片化和可再生能源限电等问题上得到了最好的体现。此外,本文还提供了两个案例研究——均为中国最近的电力市场实验——以详细说明国家和市场如何共同服务于部门职能以及更广泛的经济和政治目标。