Al Kadah Basel, Papaspyrou George, Schneider Mathias, Schick Bernhard
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Homburg/Saar, Kirrberger Straße, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Institut of Anaplastology Schneider, Zweibrücken, Germany.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Mar;273(3):697-702. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3795-2. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
The undesired dilatation of the tracheooesophageal shunt after surgical implantation of voice prosthesis is a typical complication of this procedure. Temporary removal of the prosthesis and reinsertion after a short period of time is a first-line therapeutical option aiming shrinkage of the shunt. Failure of this measure generally is an indication of revision surgery. We present first experiences treating leakage problems with novel modified voice prosthesis without surgical intervention in specified cases. 11 patients (1 female, 10 male) aging between 51 and 71 years were presented with shunt leakage between 11/2008 and 11/2012 in the ENT-Department of the University Hospital of Homburg/Saar after a custom built voice prosthesis had been used initially successfully. A "Provox 2"(®) voice prosthesis was modified with two discs made of silicone each on the tracheal and oesophageal side and additionally reinforcing the diameter of the prosthesis by a silicone tube. The modified prosthesis was inserted in a retrograde way under general anesthesia, analogical to the approach used with the "Provox 1"(®)-prosthesis. The period of observation ranged between 12 and 48 months. As a measure of control swallowing of methylene blue was used. In all cases leakage suspended. Durability of the modified prosthesis ranged between 2 and 6 months. Neither the patients' complained about, nor did the physicians notice subjectively an impairment of the voice quality. Modifications of "Provox 2"(®)-prosthesis should be regarded in individual cases and constitute a reasonable alternative to revision surgery. A surgical approach is more intricate and costly, more taxing for the patient and susceptible to failure. We regard the necessity of general anesthesia for the insertion of the modified prosthesis as a disadvantage.
在手术植入语音假体后,气管食管分流出现不期望的扩张是该手术的典型并发症。临时取出假体并在短时间后重新插入是旨在使分流缩小的一线治疗选择。该措施失败通常表明需要进行翻修手术。我们介绍了在特定情况下使用新型改良语音假体在无需手术干预的情况下治疗渗漏问题的初步经验。2008年11月至2012年11月期间,在洪堡/萨尔大学医院耳鼻喉科,11名患者(1名女性,10名男性),年龄在51至71岁之间,在最初成功使用定制语音假体后出现分流渗漏。对“Provox 2”(®)语音假体进行了改良,在气管侧和食管侧各用两片硅胶圆盘,并另外用硅胶管加强假体直径。改良后的假体在全身麻醉下逆行插入,类似于使用“Provox 1”(®)假体的方法。观察期为12至48个月。使用吞咽亚甲蓝作为对照措施。在所有病例中渗漏均停止。改良后假体的耐用性为2至6个月。患者既没有抱怨,医生主观上也没有注意到语音质量有损害。在个别情况下应考虑对“Provox 2”(®)假体进行改良,这是翻修手术的合理替代方法。手术方法更复杂、成本更高,对患者负担更大且容易失败。我们认为插入改良假体需要全身麻醉是一个缺点。