Suppr超能文献

现实世界中糖尿病预防的挑战:墨尔本糖尿病预防研究的结果和经验教训。

Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world: results and lessons from the Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study.

机构信息

Faculty of Health , Deakin Population Health Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood Campus , Burwood, Victoria , Australia.

Greater Green Triangle University Department of Rural Health , Flinders and Deakin Universities , Warrnambool, Victoria , Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2015 Oct 1;3(1):e000131. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000131. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess effectiveness and implementability of the public health programme Life! Taking action on diabetes in Australian people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS) was a unique study assessing effectiveness of Life! that used a randomized controlled trial design. Intervention participants with AUSDRISK score ≥15 received 1 individual and 5 structured 90 min group sessions. Controls received usual care. Outcome measures were obtained for all participants at baseline and 12 months and, additionally, for intervention participants at 3 months. Per protocol set (PPS) and intention to treat (ITT) analyses were performed.

RESULTS

PPS analyses were considered more informative from our study. In PPS analyses, intervention participants significantly improved in weight (-1.13 kg, p=0.016), waist circumference (-1.35 cm, p=0.044), systolic (-5.2 mm Hg, p=0.028) and diastolic blood pressure (-3.2 mm Hg, p=0.030) compared with controls. Based on observed weight change, estimated risk of developing diabetes reduced by 9.6% in the intervention and increased by 3.3% in control participants. Absolute 5-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduced significantly for intervention participants by 0.97 percentage points from 9.35% (10.4% relative risk reduction). In control participants, the risk increased by 0.11 percentage points (1.3% relative risk increase). The net effect for the change in CVD risk was -1.08 percentage points of absolute risk (p=0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

MDPS effectively reduced the risk of diabetes and CVD, but the intervention effect on weight and waist reduction was modest due to the challenges in recruiting high-risk individuals and the abbreviated intervention.

摘要

目的

评估公共卫生计划“生活!”在有发展为 2 型糖尿病风险的澳大利亚人群中针对糖尿病采取行动的效果和实施性。

研究设计和方法

墨尔本糖尿病预防研究(MDPS)是一项独特的研究,评估了 Life!的效果,使用了随机对照试验设计。AUSDRISK 评分≥15 的干预参与者接受 1 次个体和 5 次结构化的 90 分钟小组课程。对照组接受常规护理。所有参与者在基线和 12 个月时获得了结果测量值,并且,对于干预参与者,还在 3 个月时获得了结果测量值。进行了符合方案集(PPS)和意向治疗(ITT)分析。

结果

从我们的研究来看,PPS 分析被认为更具信息量。在 PPS 分析中,与对照组相比,干预参与者的体重(-1.13kg,p=0.016)、腰围(-1.35cm,p=0.044)、收缩压(-5.2mmHg,p=0.028)和舒张压(-3.2mmHg,p=0.030)均显著改善。根据观察到的体重变化,干预组发生糖尿病的风险估计降低了 9.6%,而对照组则增加了 3.3%。干预参与者的绝对 5 年心血管疾病(CVD)风险显著降低了 0.97 个百分点,从 9.35%(相对风险降低 10.4%)。在对照组中,风险增加了 0.11 个百分点(相对风险增加 1.3%)。CVD 风险变化的净效应为绝对风险降低 1.08 个百分点(p=0.013)。

结论

MDPS 有效地降低了糖尿病和 CVD 的风险,但由于招募高风险个体的挑战和缩短的干预措施,体重和腰围减少的干预效果不大。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验