Suppr超能文献

口服米力农、地高辛及其联合用药治疗慢性心力衰竭患者的比较。

A comparison of oral milrinone, digoxin, and their combination in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure.

作者信息

DiBianco R, Shabetai R, Kostuk W, Moran J, Schlant R C, Wright R

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Washington Adventist Hospital, Takoma Park, MD 20912.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 16;320(11):677-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198903163201101.

Abstract

We randomly assigned 230 patients in sinus rhythm with moderately severe heart failure to treatment with digoxin, milrinone, both, or placebo. The effects of each were compared during a 12-week, double-blind trial. Treatment with milrinone or digoxin significantly increased treadmill exercise time as compared with placebo (by 82 and 64 seconds respectively; 95 percent confidence limits, 44 and 123, and 30 and 100). Both treatments reduced the frequency of decompensation from heart failure, from 47 percent with placebo to 34 percent with milrinone (P less than 0.05; 95 percent confidence limits, 22 and 46) and 15 percent with digoxin (P less than 0.01; 95 percent confidence limits, 7 and 26). However, the clinical condition of 20 percent of the patients taking milrinone deteriorated within two weeks after treatment was begun, as compared with only 3 percent of those taking digoxin (P less than 0.05). The left ventricular ejection fraction at rest was not significantly changed by milrinone (+0.2 percent; 95 percent confidence limits, -1.5 and 1.9), but it was increased by digoxin (+1.7 percent; P less than 0.01; 95 percent confidence limits, -0.03 and 3.4) and decreased by placebo (-2.0 percent; 95 percent confidence limits, -3.8 and -0.1). Three-month survival was related inversely to the base-line ejection fraction. Analysis of mortality from all causes according to the intention to treat suggested an adverse effect of milrinone (P = 0.064). After adjustment for an excess of patients with lower ejection fractions randomly assigned to receive milrinone, this trend was not significant (P = 0.26). Increased ventricular arrhythmias occurred more frequently in patients who received milrinone than in those who did not (18 vs. 4 percent; P less than 0.03). We conclude that milrinone significantly increased exercise tolerance and reduced the frequency of worsened heart failure. However, in the population of patients studied, milrinone or the combination of milrinone and digoxin offered no advantage over digoxin alone. Furthermore, our data suggest that milrinone may aggravate ventricular arrhythmias.

摘要

我们将230例中度严重心力衰竭的窦性心律患者随机分为地高辛组、米力农组、联合用药组或安慰剂组。在一项为期12周的双盲试验中比较了各组的疗效。与安慰剂相比,米力农或地高辛治疗显著增加了跑步机运动时间(分别增加82秒和64秒;95%置信区间为44至123秒,以及30至100秒)。两种治疗均降低了心力衰竭失代偿的频率,从安慰剂组的47%降至米力农组的34%(P<0.05;95%置信区间为22至46)以及地高辛组的15%(P<0.01;95%置信区间为7至26)。然而,开始治疗后两周内,20%服用米力农的患者临床状况恶化,而服用地高辛的患者仅为3%(P<0.05)。静息时左心室射血分数米力农组无显著变化(+0.2%;95%置信区间为-1.5至1.9),地高辛组升高(+1.7%;P<0.01;95%置信区间为-0.03至3.4),安慰剂组降低(-2.0%;95%置信区间为-3.8至-0.1)。三个月生存率与基线射血分数呈负相关。根据意向性分析所有原因导致的死亡率提示米力农有不良影响(P=0.064)。在对随机分配接受米力农的射血分数较低的患者过多进行调整后,这种趋势不显著(P=0.26)。接受米力农的患者室性心律失常发生率高于未接受者(18%对4%;P<0.03)。我们得出结论,米力农显著增加运动耐量并降低心力衰竭恶化频率。然而,在所研究的患者群体中,米力农或米力农与地高辛联合用药并不比单独使用地高辛有优势。此外,我们的数据表明米力农可能加重室性心律失常。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验