Suppr超能文献

在4小时内使用四个99mTc-DTPA血浆样本进行准确且精确的血浆清除率测量。

Accurate and precise plasma clearance measurement using four 99mTc-DTPA plasma samples over 4 h.

作者信息

Wanasundara Surajith N, Wesolowski Michal J, Barnfield Mark C, Waller Michael L, Murray Anthony W, Burniston Maria T, Babyn Paul S, Wesolowski Carl A

机构信息

aDepartment of Medical Imaging, Royal University Hospital, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan bDepartment of Radiology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Nuclear Medicine, The General Hospital, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada cThe Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds dNuclear Medicine Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield eNuclear Medicine Department, The Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Nucl Med Commun. 2016 Jan;37(1):79-86. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000405.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Glomerular filtration rate can be measured as the plasma clearance (CL) of a glomerular filtration rate marker despite body fluid disturbances using numerous, prolonged time samples. We desire a simplified technique without compromised accuracy and precision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared CL values derived from two plasma concentration curve area methods - (a) biexponential fitting [CL (E2)] and (b) Tikhonov adaptively regularized gamma variate fitting [CL (Tk-GV)] - for 4 versus 8 h time samplings from 412 Tc-DTPA studies in 142 patients, mostly paediatric patients, with suspected fluid disturbances.

RESULTS

CL (Tk-GV) from four samples/4 h and from nine samples/8 h, both accurately and precisely agreed with the standard, which was taken to be nine samples/8 h CL from (noncompartmental) numerical integration [CL (NI)]. The E2 method, four samples/4 h, and nine samples/8 h median CL values significantly overestimated the CL (NI) values by 4.9 and 3.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the standard, CL (E2) from four samples/4 h and from nine samples/8 h proved to be the most inaccurate and imprecise method examined, and can be replaced by better methods for calculating CL. The CL (Tk-GV) can be used to reduce sampling time in half from 8 to 4 h and from nine to four samples for a precise and accurate, yet more easily tolerated and simplified test.

摘要

目的

尽管存在体液紊乱,肾小球滤过率仍可通过使用多个延长时间的样本,以肾小球滤过率标志物的血浆清除率(CL)来测量。我们希望有一种简化的技术,同时不影响准确性和精密度。

材料与方法

我们比较了两种血浆浓度曲线面积法得出的CL值——(a)双指数拟合[CL(E2)]和(b)蒂洪诺夫自适应正则化伽马变量拟合[CL(Tk-GV)]——针对142例患者(大多数为儿科患者)的412项Tc-DTPA研究,这些患者疑似存在体液紊乱,分别进行4小时的4次采样和8小时的8次采样。

结果

4小时4次采样和8小时9次采样得出的CL(Tk-GV),在准确性和精密度上均与标准值相符,标准值采用(非房室)数值积分[CL(NI)]得出的8小时9次采样的CL值。E2法,4小时4次采样和8小时9次采样的CL中位数分别比CL(NI)值显著高估了4.9%和3.8%。

结论

与标准值相比,4小时4次采样和8小时9次采样得出的CL(E2)被证明是所检测方法中最不准确和不精密的,可以被更好的CL计算方法所取代。CL(Tk-GV)可用于将采样时间从8小时减半至4小时,样本数量从9次减至4次,从而进行更精确、更易于耐受且简化的检测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2340/4890829/1af19da95f04/mnm-37-79-g007.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验