Rutkowski Jacqueline E, Rutkowski Emília W
SUSTENTAR Institute for Sustainability Studies and Research and ORIS Inclusive Solidarity Recycling Observatory, Brumadinho, Brazil
FLUXUS Laboratory, Sanitation and Environment Department, FEC/UNICAMP, and ORIS Inclusive Solidarity Recycling Observatory, Campinas, Brasil.
Waste Manag Res. 2015 Dec;33(12):1084-93. doi: 10.1177/0734242X15607424. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
'If an integrated urban waste management system includes the informal recycling sector (IRS), there is a good chance that more solid waste is recycled' is common sense. However, informal integration brings additional social, environmental, and economic benefits, such as reduction of operational costs and environmental impacts of landfilling. Brazil is a global best practice example in terms of waste picker inclusion, and has received international recognition for its recycling levels. In addition to analysing the results of inclusive recycling approaches, this article evaluates a selection of the best Brazilian inclusive recycling practices and summaries and presents the resulting knowledge. The objective is to identify processes that enable the replication of the inclusion of the informal recycling sector model as part of municipal solid waste management. Qualitative and quantitative data have been collected in 25 Brazilian cities that have contracted waste pickers co-operatives for door-to-door selective collection of recyclables. Field data was collected in action research projects that worked with waste pickers co-operatives between 2006 and 2013. The Brazilian informal recycling sector integration model improves municipal solid waste recycling indicators: it shows an increase in the net tonness recycled, from 140 to 208 t month(-1), at a much lower cost per tonne than conventional selective collection systems. Inclusive systems show costs of US$35 per tonne of recyclables collected, well below the national average of US$195.26. This inclusive model improves the quality of collected material and the efficiency of municipal selective collection. It also diminishes the negative impacts of informal recycling, by reducing child labour, and by improving the conditions of work, occupational health and safety, and uncontrolled pollution. Although treating the Brazilian experience as a blueprint for transfer of experience in every case is unrealistic, the results suggest that this approach to informal sector integration can be considered among the global best practices for informal sector integration. The article closes with recommendations for deploying technology in other urban areas throughout the world.
“如果一个城市综合废物管理系统纳入了非正规回收部门(IRS),那么更多的固体废物就很有可能得到回收利用”,这是常识。然而,非正规整合还带来了额外的社会、环境和经济效益,比如降低运营成本以及填埋对环境的影响。巴西在吸纳拾荒者方面堪称全球最佳实践范例,其回收水平也获得了国际认可。除了分析包容性回收方法的成果外,本文还评估了巴西一些最佳的包容性回收实践,并总结和呈现了由此得出的知识。目的是确定能够复制将非正规回收部门模式纳入城市固体废物管理的流程。在巴西25个城市收集了定性和定量数据,这些城市与拾荒者合作社签约,进行上门选择性回收物收集。实地数据是在2006年至2013年期间与拾荒者合作社合作开展的行动研究项目中收集的。巴西非正规回收部门整合模式提高了城市固体废物回收指标:回收净吨数从每月140吨增加到208吨,每吨成本比传统选择性收集系统低得多。包容性系统显示,每吨回收物的收集成本为35美元,远低于195.26美元的全国平均水平。这种包容性模式提高了收集材料的质量和城市选择性收集的效率。它还通过减少童工、改善工作条件、职业健康与安全以及不受控制的污染,减少了非正规回收的负面影响。虽然将巴西的经验视为在每种情况下都可照搬的蓝本是不现实的,但结果表明,这种非正规部门整合方法可被视为全球非正规部门整合的最佳实践之一。文章最后给出了在世界其他城市地区应用相关技术的建议。