Suppr超能文献

阿片类药物依赖的药物辅助治疗留存率:一项系统评价。

Retention in medication-assisted treatment for opiate dependence: A systematic review.

作者信息

Timko Christine, Schultz Nicole R, Cucciare Michael A, Vittorio Lisa, Garrison-Diehn Christina

机构信息

a Center for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System , Palo Alto , California , USA.

b Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences , Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford , California , USA.

出版信息

J Addict Dis. 2016;35(1):22-35. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2016.1100960. Epub 2015 Oct 14.

Abstract

Retention in medication-assisted treatment among opiate-dependent patients is associated with better outcomes. This systematic review (55 articles, 2010-2014) found wide variability in retention rates (i.e., 19%-94% at 3-month, 46%-92% at 4-month, 3%-88% at 6-month, and 37%-91% at 12-month follow-ups in randomized controlled trials), and identified medication and behavioral therapy factors associated with retention. As expected, patients who received naltrexone or buprenorphine had better retention rates than patients who received a placebo or no medication. Consistent with prior research, methadone was associated with better retention than buprenorphine/naloxone. And, heroin-assisted treatment was associated with better retention than methadone among treatment-refractory patients. Only a single study examined retention in medication-assisted treatment for longer than 1 year, and studies of behavioral therapies may have lacked statistical power; thus, studies with longer-term follow-ups and larger samples are needed. Contingency management showed promise to increase retention, but other behavioral therapies to increase retention, such as supervision of medication consumption, or additional counseling, education, or support, failed to find differences between intervention and control conditions. Promising behavioral therapies to increase retention have yet to be identified.

摘要

阿片类药物依赖患者坚持药物辅助治疗与更好的治疗效果相关。这项系统评价(2010 - 2014年的55篇文章)发现坚持率存在很大差异(即随机对照试验中3个月时为19% - 94%,4个月时为46% - 92%,6个月时为3% - 88%,12个月随访时为37% - 91%),并确定了与坚持相关的药物和行为治疗因素。正如预期的那样,接受纳曲酮或丁丙诺啡治疗的患者比接受安慰剂或未接受药物治疗的患者坚持率更高。与先前的研究一致,美沙酮与比丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮更好的坚持率相关。而且,在治疗难治性患者中,海洛因辅助治疗比美沙酮有更好的坚持率。只有一项研究对药物辅助治疗的坚持情况进行了超过1年的考察,行为治疗的研究可能缺乏统计学效力;因此,需要进行长期随访和大样本的研究。应急管理显示出提高坚持率的前景,但其他提高坚持率的行为治疗,如药物服用监督或额外的咨询、教育或支持,在干预组和对照组之间未发现差异。尚未确定有前景的提高坚持率的行为治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d99d/6542472/ab5037792577/nihms-1013457-f0001.jpg

相似文献

3
Heroin anticraving medications: a systematic review.海洛因戒毒药物:系统评价。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2010 Nov;36(6):332-41. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2010.505991. Epub 2010 Oct 19.
4
Buprenorphine for managing opioid withdrawal.丁丙诺啡用于管理阿片类药物戒断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 21;2(2):CD002025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002025.pub5.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Prize contingency management for smoking cessation: a randomized trial.用于戒烟的奖励性应急管理:一项随机试验。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Jul 1;140:208-12. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.03.032. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
9
Leaving buprenorphine treatment: patients' reasons for cessation of care.停止丁丙诺啡治疗:患者终止治疗的原因
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014 Mar;46(3):356-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Oct 14.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验