Suppr超能文献

用于戒烟的奖励性应急管理:一项随机试验。

Prize contingency management for smoking cessation: a randomized trial.

作者信息

Ledgerwood David M, Arfken Cynthia L, Petry Nancy M, Alessi Sheila M

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 3901 Chrysler Drive, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 3901 Chrysler Drive, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Jul 1;140:208-12. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.03.032. Epub 2014 Apr 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adjunctive behavioral smoking cessation treatments have the potential to improve outcomes beyond standard care. The present study had two aims: (1) compare standard care (SC) for smoking (four weeks of brief counseling and monitoring) to SC plus prize-based contingency management (CM), involving the chance to earn prizes on days with demonstrated smoking abstinence (carbon monoxide (CO) ≤6 ppm); and (2) compare the relative efficacy of two prize reinforcement schedules-one a traditional CM schedule, and the second an early enhanced CM schedule providing greater reinforcement magnitude in the initial week of treatment but equal overall reinforcement.

METHODS

Participants (N=81 nicotine-dependent cigarette smokers) were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions.

RESULTS

Prize CM resulted in significant reductions in cigarette smoking relative to SC. These reductions were not apparent at follow-up. We found no meaningful differences between the traditional and enhanced CM conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings reveal that prize CM leads to significant reductions in smoking during treatment relative to a control intervention, but the benefits did not extend long-term.

摘要

背景

辅助行为戒烟治疗有可能改善标准护理之外的治疗效果。本研究有两个目的:(1)将吸烟的标准护理(SC)(四周的简短咨询和监测)与SC加基于奖励的应急管理(CM)进行比较,后者涉及在证明戒烟(一氧化碳(CO)≤6 ppm)的日子有机会赢得奖品;(2)比较两种奖励强化方案的相对疗效——一种是传统的CM方案,另一种是早期强化CM方案,在治疗的第一周提供更大的强化幅度,但总体强化相同。

方法

参与者(N = 81名尼古丁依赖吸烟者)被随机分配到三种条件之一。

结果

与SC相比,奖励CM导致吸烟量显著减少。这些减少在随访时并不明显。我们发现传统CM条件和强化CM条件之间没有有意义的差异。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,与对照干预相比,奖励CM在治疗期间导致吸烟量显著减少,但益处并未长期持续。

相似文献

1
Prize contingency management for smoking cessation: a randomized trial.用于戒烟的奖励性应急管理:一项随机试验。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Jul 1;140:208-12. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.03.032. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
8
Improving contingency management programs for addiction.改进成瘾的应急管理项目。
Addict Behav. 2004 May;29(3):507-23. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.021.

引用本文的文献

1
Incentives for smoking cessation.戒烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 13;1(1):CD004307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub7.
6
Incentives for smoking cessation.戒烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 17;7(7):CD004307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub6.
7
Competitions for smoking cessation.戒烟竞赛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 20;2(2):CD013272. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013272.

本文引用的文献

10
Shaping smoking cessation using percentile schedules.使用百分位数时间表塑造戒烟行为。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Dec 7;76(3):247-59. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.05.008.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验