Suppr超能文献

危重症患者床边普通及心脏超声检查应用指南——第一部分:普通超声检查。

Guidelines for the Appropriate Use of Bedside General and Cardiac Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Critically Ill Patients-Part I: General Ultrasonography.

机构信息

1Los Angeles, CA. 2Foothills Medical Centre and the University of Calgary, Calgary, AL, Canada. 3National and Gulf Center for Evidence Based Health Practice, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 4King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 5Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 6Professor of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, St. Francis Hospital, Columbus, GA. 7Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA. 8Department of Emergency Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA. 9Aerospace and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 10President and CEO, Renown Health, Reno, NV. 11Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of the Sarrland, Homburg-Saar, Germany. 12Clinics of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Hospital of the Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. 13Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 14Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA. 15Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2479-502. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001216.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish evidence-based guidelines for the use of bedside ultrasound by intensivists and specialists in the ICU and equivalent care sites for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes for organs of the chest, abdomen, pelvis, neck, and extremities.

METHODS

The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to determine the strength of recommendations as either strong or conditional/weak and to rank the "levels" of quality of evidence into high (A), moderate (B), or low (C) and thus generating six "grades" of recommendation (1A-1B-1C-2A-2B-2C). Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used for all questions with clinically relevant outcomes. RAND appropriateness method, incorporating modified Delphi technique, was used in steps of GRADE that required panel judgment and for those based purely on expert consensus. The process was conducted by teleconference and electronic-based discussion, following clear rules for establishing consensus and agreement/disagreement. Individual panel members provided full disclosure and were judged to be free of any commercial bias. The process was conducted independent of industry funding.

RESULTS

Twenty-four statements regarding the use of ultrasound were considered-three did not achieve agreement and nine were approved as conditional recommendations (strength class 2). The remaining 12 statements were approved as strong recommendations (strength class 1). Each recommendation was also linked to its level of quality of evidence. Key strong recommendations included the use of ultrasonography for ruling-in pleural effusion and assisting its drainage, ascites drainage, ruling-in pneumothorax, central venous cannulation, particularly for internal jugular and femoral sites, and for diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. Conditional recommendations were given to the use of ultrasound by the intensivist for diagnosis of acalculous cholecystitis, renal failure, and interstitial and parenchymal lung diseases. No recommendations were made regarding static (vs dynamic) ultrasound guidance of vascular access or the use of needle guide devices.

CONCLUSIONS

There was strong agreement among a large cohort of international experts regarding several recommendations for the use of ultrasound in the ICU. Evidence-based recommendations regarding the appropriate use of this technology are a step toward improving patient outcomes in relevant patients.

摘要

目的

为 ICU 及同等护理场所的重症监护医师和专家制定基于循证的床边超声使用指南,以用于胸部、腹部、骨盆、颈部和四肢器官的诊断和治疗目的。

方法

使用推荐分级评估、制定与评价(Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation,GRADE)系统来确定推荐意见的强度,为强或有条件/弱,并将证据质量的“级别”分为高(A)、中(B)或低(C),从而产生 6 个推荐等级(1A-1B-1C-2A-2B-2C)。所有具有临床相关结局的问题均采用推荐分级评估、制定与评价(GRADE)。在需要小组判断和完全基于专家共识的 GRADE 步骤中,采用适宜性分级(RAND)方法,纳入改良 Delphi 技术。该过程通过电话会议和电子讨论进行,明确了建立共识和一致/不一致的规则。每个小组成员都提供了充分的披露,并被判定为没有任何商业偏见。该过程独立于行业资助进行。

结果

共考虑了 24 条关于超声使用的陈述——其中 3 条未达成一致,9 条被批准为有条件推荐(强度等级 2)。其余 12 条陈述被批准为强推荐(强度等级 1)。每个推荐意见也与它的证据质量级别相关联。主要的强推荐意见包括使用超声诊断胸腔积液并协助引流、腹水引流、气胸诊断、中心静脉置管,特别是颈内静脉和股静脉置管,以及诊断深静脉血栓形成。有条件推荐意见为重症监护医师使用超声诊断急性胆囊炎、肾功能衰竭和间质性和实质性肺部疾病。对于血管通路的静态(vs 动态)超声引导或使用针引导装置,没有提出推荐意见。

结论

在很大一部分国际专家中,对几项 ICU 中超声使用的推荐意见达成了强烈共识。基于循证的适当使用该技术的推荐意见是改善相关患者的患者结局的一步。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验