• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二期牙槽骨植骨对上颌骨生长的影响:单侧与双侧唇腭裂患者对比

Effect of Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting on the Maxillary Growth: Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.

作者信息

Seo Jihee, Kim Sukwha, Yang Il-Hyung, Baek Seung-Hak

机构信息

*Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry †Department of Plastic Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University ‡Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Oct;26(7):2128-32. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002133.

DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000002133
PMID:26468796
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) on the maxillary growth in patients with unilateral (UCLP) and bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). The samples consisted of 40 Korean boy cleft patients who had the similar initial skeletal characteristics and were treated with the identical treatment protocol. They were divided into UCLP group (N = 25; mean SABG age, 9.9 years; mean follow-up duration, 42.3 months) and BCLP group (N = 15; mean SABG age, 10.2 years; mean follow-up duration, 40.6 months). In the lateral cephalograms taken 1 month before (T1) and at least 2 years after SABG (T2), cephalometric variables were measured. At T1 stage, the 2 groups did not exhibit significant differences in the cephalometric variables except posterior maxillary height (P-HRP) (P < 0.05). At T2 stage, both groups exhibited the reduced sagittal growth (UCLP, ANB, P < 0.001; AB to facial plane angle (AB-FPA), P < 0.01; BCLP, A to N perpendicular, P < 0.05; ANB and AB-FPA, P < 0.001) and the undisturbed vertical growth (A-HRP and P-HRP, all P < 0.001) of the maxilla. During T1 to T2, BCLP group experienced more aggravation of Class III skeletal pattern than UCLP group (ΔAB-FPA, P < 0.05). There, however, were no differences in the amounts of changes in the maxillary vertical position and mandibular plane angulation between the 2 groups. Two-stage SABG procedure subgroup in patients with BCLP demonstrated a more retrusive maxilla compared with 1-stage SABG procedure subgroup (ΔSNA, P < 0.05). Patients with BCLP, especially who underwent 2-stage SABG procedure, might have a possibility of poor sagittal growth of the maxilla compared with patients having UCLP.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查二期牙槽骨植骨术(SABG)对单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)和双侧唇腭裂(BCLP)患者上颌骨生长的影响。样本包括40名韩国腭裂男童患者,他们具有相似的初始骨骼特征,并采用相同的治疗方案进行治疗。他们被分为UCLP组(N = 25;平均SABG年龄9.9岁;平均随访时间42.3个月)和BCLP组(N = 15;平均SABG年龄10.2岁;平均随访时间40.6个月)。在SABG术前1个月(T1)和术后至少2年(T2)拍摄的头颅侧位片中,测量头影测量变量。在T1阶段,除上颌后份高度(P-HRP)外,两组在头影测量变量上无显著差异(P < 0.05)。在T2阶段,两组上颌骨矢状向生长均减少(UCLP组,ANB,P < 0.001;AB与面平面角(AB-FPA),P < 0.01;BCLP组,A到N垂线,P < 0.05;ANB和AB-FPA,P < 0.001),垂直向生长未受干扰(A-HRP和P-HRP,均P < 0.001)。在T1至T2期间,BCLP组比UCLP组Ⅲ类骨骼型加重更明显(ΔAB-FPA,P < 0.05)。然而,两组在上颌垂直位置和下颌平面角度变化量上没有差异。与一期SABG手术亚组相比,BCLP患者的二期SABG手术亚组上颌骨更后缩(ΔSNA,P < 0.05)。与UCLP患者相比,BCLP患者,尤其是接受二期SABG手术的患者,上颌骨矢状向生长可能较差。

相似文献

1
Effect of Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting on the Maxillary Growth: Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.二期牙槽骨植骨对上颌骨生长的影响:单侧与双侧唇腭裂患者对比
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Oct;26(7):2128-32. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002133.
2
Examination of craniofacial morphology in 10-month to 5-year-old children with cleft lip and palate.唇腭裂患儿10个月至5岁颅面形态检查
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997 Nov;34(6):490-7. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1997_034_0490_eocmim_2.3.co_2.
3
Effects of growth on maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate.生长对唇腭裂上颌骨牵引成骨的影响。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;41(8):836-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.01.038. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
4
Prediction of the Need for Orthognathic Surgery in Patients With Cleft Lip and/or Palate.唇腭裂患者正颌手术需求的预测
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jun;26(4):1159-62. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001605.
5
Soft-tissue profile growth in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: A cephalometric comparison with normal controls at ages 7, 11, and 18 years.修复完全性单侧唇腭裂患者软组织侧貌的生长变化:7、11、18 岁与正常对照组的头影测量比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Mar;145(3):341-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.11.018.
6
Growth-related changes of skeletal and upper-airway features in bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.双侧唇腭裂患者骨骼和上气道特征的生长相关变化
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Oct;148(4):576-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.02.031.
7
Maxillofacial morphology in post-pubertal patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate following early vs. late secondary alveolar bone grafting.单侧唇腭裂术后青少年患者早期与晚期行牙槽骨二次骨移植后的颌面部形态。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021 Sep;49(9):809-814. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.04.012. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
8
Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.单侧和双侧唇腭裂患者使用面具式上颌骨前牵引和微型板锚固的效果比较。
Angle Orthod. 2012 Sep;82(5):935-41. doi: 10.2319/010112-1.1. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
9
Initial growth pattern of children with cleft before alveolar bone graft stage according to cleft type.根据裂隙类型,牙槽突裂植骨阶段前裂隙儿童的初始生长模式。
Angle Orthod. 2011 Nov;81(6):1103-10. doi: 10.2319/030411-159.1. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
10
Sagittal growth of the facial skeleton of 6-year-old children with a complete unilateral cleft of lip, alveolus and palate treated with two different protocols.采用两种不同方案治疗的单侧唇、牙槽突及腭裂完全性患儿面部骨骼的矢状生长情况。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007 Dec;35(8):343-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Long-term Stability of Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafts in Cleft Palate Patients Using Multislice Computed Tomography and Three-Dimensional Printed Models: A Prospective Study.使用多层螺旋计算机断层扫描和三维打印模型评估腭裂患者二期牙槽骨移植的长期稳定性:一项前瞻性研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1496-S1500. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_265_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
2
Orthodontic and orthopedic treatment for a growing patient with Tessier number 0 cleft.针对患有第0型特谢埃裂(Tessier number 0 cleft)的生长发育期患者的正畸和正颌治疗。
Korean J Orthod. 2018 Mar;48(2):113-124. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2018.48.2.113. Epub 2018 Feb 6.