Nemet Arie Y
Department of Ophthalmology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Sava, Israel.
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Oct;26(7):e569-71. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001304.
The marginal reflex distance (MRD), the position of the eyelids with the eyes in the primary position, is fundamental to patient assessment and surgery choice in facial and ophthalmic plastic surgery. This study compares the accuracy of handheld ruler and slit lamp biomicroscope measurements of the MRD1 in patients with blepharoptosis.
This is a prospective study of 85 consecutive patients who were referred to our oculoplastic clinic between 2011 and 2013 for unilateral or bilateral ptosis repair. The MRD1 was measured by 2 techniques: 1. With the use of a penlight to illuminate the cornea, the corneal light reflex is observed, and the distance between the cornea and the upper lid margin is recorded. 2. Slit lamp biomicroscope assessment. A comparison between those 2 methods was performed.
The mean (SD) MRD1 was 1.18 (1.11) mm and 1.06 (1.18) mm with a penlight and a slit lamp, respectively. There was a significant difference between the 2 measurements, but they were highly correlated in the paired t-test and the Wilcoxon test. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.984, representing excellent reliability.
The MRD1 measured by a skilled clinician yields reliable results using a penlight and a ruler. In some cases, measurement of eyelid heights (palpebral fissure, MRD1, brow position) is challenging. The use of a slit lamp biomicroscope and a close front photograph may help determine accurate measurements.
边缘反射距离(MRD),即眼睛处于原位时眼睑的位置,是面部和眼科整形手术中患者评估及手术选择的基础。本研究比较了手持直尺和裂隙灯生物显微镜测量上睑下垂患者MRD1的准确性。
这是一项前瞻性研究,连续纳入了2011年至2013年间转诊至我们眼科整形门诊进行单侧或双侧上睑下垂修复的85例患者。采用两种技术测量MRD1:1. 使用笔灯照亮角膜,观察角膜光反射,并记录角膜与上睑缘之间的距离。2. 裂隙灯生物显微镜评估。对这两种方法进行了比较。
使用笔灯和裂隙灯测量的平均(标准差)MRD1分别为1.18(1.11)mm和1.06(1.18)mm。两种测量方法之间存在显著差异,但在配对t检验和Wilcoxon检验中它们高度相关。组内相关系数为0.984,表明可靠性极佳。
由熟练的临床医生使用笔灯和直尺测量MRD1可得出可靠结果。在某些情况下,测量眼睑高度(睑裂、MRD1、眉位置)具有挑战性。使用裂隙灯生物显微镜和近距离正面照片可能有助于确定准确的测量值。