Suppr超能文献

医疗保健专业人员中的隐性种族/民族偏见及其对医疗保健结果的影响:一项系统综述。

Implicit Racial/Ethnic Bias Among Health Care Professionals and Its Influence on Health Care Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Hall William J, Chapman Mimi V, Lee Kent M, Merino Yesenia M, Thomas Tainayah W, Payne B Keith, Eng Eugenia, Day Steven H, Coyne-Beasley Tamera

机构信息

At the time of the study, William J. Hall, Mimi V. Chapman, and Steven H. Day were with the School of Social Work; Kent M. Lee and B. Keith Payne were with the Department of Psychology; Yesenia M. Merino, Tainayah W. Thomas, and Eugenia Eng were with the Gillings School of Global Public Health; and Tamera Coyne-Beasley was with the School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2015 Dec;105(12):e60-76. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302903. Epub 2015 Oct 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the United States, people of color face disparities in access to health care, the quality of care received, and health outcomes. The attitudes and behaviors of health care providers have been identified as one of many factors that contribute to health disparities. Implicit attitudes are thoughts and feelings that often exist outside of conscious awareness, and thus are difficult to consciously acknowledge and control. These attitudes are often automatically activated and can influence human behavior without conscious volition.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the extent to which implicit racial/ethnic bias exists among health care professionals and examined the relationships between health care professionals' implicit attitudes about racial/ethnic groups and health care outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

To identify relevant studies, we searched 10 computerized bibliographic databases and used a reference harvesting technique.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We assessed eligibility using double independent screening based on a priori inclusion criteria. We included studies if they sampled existing health care providers or those in training to become health care providers, measured and reported results on implicit racial/ethnic bias, and were written in English.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We included a total of 15 studies for review and then subjected them to double independent data extraction. Information extracted included the citation, purpose of the study, use of theory, study design, study site and location, sampling strategy, response rate, sample size and characteristics, measurement of relevant variables, analyses performed, and results and findings. We summarized study design characteristics, and categorized and then synthesized substantive findings.

MAIN RESULTS

Almost all studies used cross-sectional designs, convenience sampling, US participants, and the Implicit Association Test to assess implicit bias. Low to moderate levels of implicit racial/ethnic bias were found among health care professionals in all but 1 study. These implicit bias scores are similar to those in the general population. Levels of implicit bias against Black, Hispanic/Latino/Latina, and dark-skinned people were relatively similar across these groups. Although some associations between implicit bias and health care outcomes were nonsignificant, results also showed that implicit bias was significantly related to patient-provider interactions, treatment decisions, treatment adherence, and patient health outcomes. Implicit attitudes were more often significantly related to patient-provider interactions and health outcomes than treatment processes.

CONCLUSIONS

Most health care providers appear to have implicit bias in terms of positive attitudes toward Whites and negative attitudes toward people of color. Future studies need to employ more rigorous methods to examine the relationships between implicit bias and health care outcomes. Interventions targeting implicit attitudes among health care professionals are needed because implicit bias may contribute to health disparities for people of color.

摘要

背景

在美国,有色人种在获得医疗保健、所接受的护理质量和健康结果方面面临差异。医疗保健提供者的态度和行为已被确定为导致健康差异的众多因素之一。内隐态度是通常存在于意识之外的想法和感受,因此难以有意识地承认和控制。这些态度往往会自动被激活,并能在没有意识意志的情况下影响人类行为。

目的

我们调查了医疗保健专业人员中存在内隐种族/民族偏见的程度,并研究了医疗保健专业人员对种族/民族群体的内隐态度与医疗保健结果之间的关系。

检索方法

为了识别相关研究,我们检索了10个计算机化书目数据库,并使用了参考文献收集技术。

选择标准

我们根据预先设定的纳入标准,通过双人独立筛选来评估研究的 eligibility。如果研究对现有的医疗保健提供者或正在接受培训成为医疗保健提供者的人员进行抽样,测量并报告内隐种族/民族偏见的结果,且以英文撰写,我们就将其纳入。

数据收集与分析

我们总共纳入了15项研究进行综述,然后对它们进行双人独立的数据提取。提取的信息包括引文、研究目的、理论的使用、研究设计、研究地点和位置、抽样策略、回复率、样本大小和特征、相关变量的测量、进行的分析以及结果和发现。我们总结了研究设计特征,并对实质性发现进行分类然后综合。

主要结果

几乎所有研究都采用横断面设计、便利抽样、美国参与者以及内隐联想测验来评估内隐偏见。除1项研究外,在所有医疗保健专业人员中都发现了低至中等水平的内隐种族/民族偏见。这些内隐偏见得分与普通人群中的得分相似。对黑人、西班牙裔/拉丁裔以及肤色较深的人的内隐偏见水平在这些群体中相对相似。尽管内隐偏见与医疗保健结果之间的一些关联不显著,但结果也表明内隐偏见与医患互动、治疗决策、治疗依从性以及患者健康结果显著相关。内隐态度与医患互动和健康结果的相关性往往比与治疗过程的相关性更显著。

结论

大多数医疗保健提供者似乎在对白人的积极态度和对有色人种的消极态度方面存在内隐偏见。未来的研究需要采用更严格的方法来研究内隐偏见与医疗保健结果之间的关系。由于内隐偏见可能导致有色人种的健康差异,因此需要针对医疗保健专业人员的内隐态度进行干预。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验